[Forteen88]

I just wanted to say that I did a little x265 speed-test, one compile vs another,
x265-3.0_Au+7-cb3e172_vs2017-AVX2 (msystem) vs x265-v3.0_Au+7-cb3e172a5f51-SVT-win64 [ICC 1900][MSVC 1916 Multilib][SVT][64 bit].

I encoded a 44 second long cartoon animation, 00096.m2ts, with this setting:
x265.exe --crf 18 --preset veryslow --output-depth 10 --rdoq-level 0 --psy-rdoq 0 --aq-mode 1 --aq-strength 0.4 --qcomp 0.65 --bframes 16 --rc-lookahead 48 --ref 6 --min-keyint 24 --keyint 240 --frame-threads 1 --colormatrix bt709 --deblock -2:-2 --no-sao --psy-rd 0.4 --tskip --tskip-fast --tu-inter 4 --tu-intra 4 --frames 1066


x265-3.0_Au+7-cb3e172_vs2017-AVX2 (msystem) Duration: 00:53:41
x265-v3.0_Au+7-cb3e172a5f51-SVT-win64 [ICC 1900][MSVC 1916 Multilib][SVT][64 bit] Duration: 00:53:32

Not a big difference in speed, considering I have a Intel Core i5-5200U CPU (I thought that the ICC 1900-compile would be much faster).

EDIT: By "much faster", I meant much faster than this encode was, I meant like 10% faster than the non-ICC compile.