View Single Post
Old 27th November 2021, 11:51   #18  |  Link
rwill
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 343
Looks like I have to be happy your "source" is not in H.262. What I meant is that you did not provide the snippet from the mezzanine the Blu-Ray was made from. Sorry but your source is Not So Good.

Quote:
Please zoom in and you'll see the problem is far more pronounced in the encodes.
My point that most bits go into artifacts still stands. I could zoom in but I am too afraid to contract eye cancer.

I tried encoding your VC-1 snippet and got this at 4Mbit video with a differenct encoder:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HrT...ew?usp=sharing

While the hard blocks from VC-1 got smoothed out due to rate I see no additional problems introduced around the hair ?
rwill is offline   Reply With Quote