View Single Post
Old 31st August 2016, 20:18   #1610  |  Link
LoRd_MuldeR
Software Developer
 
LoRd_MuldeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
There is nothing to be fixed

As long as Simple x264 Launcher is passing the "correct" CRF value to x264.exe on the command-line – and your confirmed yourself that it does – there is no problem on the Simple x264 Launcher side. The CRF value in the job list is irrelevant.

Furthermore: As far as I can tell, there is no problem on the x264 side either. As explained before, CRF mode does not guarantee that a CRF value of x will result in an average QP of x. CRF mode does not even guarantee that a CRF value of x will result in an average QP close to x. This may be the case for a specific set of "reference" source clips, but it is not guaranteed for all source clips. For your specific source clip it may not be the case at all!

It was a completely arbitrary decision of the x264 developers to make CRF values live on the same scale as QP values! This is just for convenience. They could have decided to make the CRF value live on a 0.0 to 1.0 scale just as well...

(If you still think x264 is doing anything wrong here, you have to bother the x264 developers. But you will probably get the same answer)
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊

Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 31st August 2016 at 20:33.
LoRd_MuldeR is offline   Reply With Quote