View Single Post
Old 1st September 2016, 00:04   #1612  |  Link
LoRd_MuldeR
Software Developer
 
LoRd_MuldeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by almosely View Post
Of course I still think theres a problem, but it seems to be within x264. As I said, I encoded the same video with the same parameters, once with your april-version, another time with the newest one. And I got almost twice as high quantizers with your newest one. So, there has to be a problem, but inside x264, as you guessed.
The meaning of the CRF values has changed many times in the history of x264. Therefore you cannot expect that a specific CRF value still has the same meaning in the "new" that it had in the "old" version.

Also, how do you know the "new" version is performing worse than the "old" version? Did you actually compare the resulting files visually? Or how did you come to the conclusion that the "new" version has a problem?

(Of course you can only compare file of the same file size, otherwise you are comparing apples and oranges. Thus, if necessary, adjust the CRF value so that both versions produce a file of the same size)
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊

Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 1st September 2016 at 00:07.
LoRd_MuldeR is offline   Reply With Quote