View Single Post
Old 10th April 2017, 09:09   #25833  |  Link
Denner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
That's the reason a different version is used. Something has changed in X264 that makes the use of LAVF extremely slow. So I used one of the old versions for X264/LAVF encoding. You could try other old version (look at the version of X264L-64 in BD-RB and work back from there).

My own tests of X264 don't show much difference between X264/LAVF and DirectshowSource -- but different processors can make a big difference.
Cool and thanks, is there a place where I can download older versions of bd-rebuilder?
On ryzen 8 core cpu the difference is huge...

Noticed that when encoding with DirectshowSource x264 32bit version is used, is this normal or am i doing something wrong?

Last edited by Denner; 10th April 2017 at 09:11.
Denner is offline   Reply With Quote