Quote:
Originally Posted by tritical
I had the same discussion with madshi about a year ago about MEDI, and the conclusion was that the MEDI paper is just weird.
|
Glad it's not just me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tritical
Anyway, based on the results they report it doesn't seem like their method is much of an improvement over nedi.
|
MEDI does a better job than NEDI at connecting pixels in the spoke images in the paper, but I haven't seen it in action anywhere else and don't know if the difference matters much for "normal" images.
Thanks for the info!