Quote:
Originally Posted by Groucho2004
Can you post an example script which would show that classic Avisynth uses less memory than AVS+? My expierence is that AVS+ is much more efficient using the available memory.
|
Not on my ancient WinXP machine...
Specs:
I tested it again using a short HD clip and converted it to DVD. I used two scripts, the first one is very basic, the second one uses jm_fps (frame rate interpolation) and is much slower. These are the scripts:
Easy.avs:
Quote:
Video = DSS2("I:\test.webm", fps = 30, preroll = 15, lavs = "l0", lavd = "l0")
Audio = DirectShowSource("I:\test.webm", video=false)
Video = Video.ConvertToYV12()
Video = Video.Spline36Resize(720,576)
Video = Video.ChangeFPS(25)
AudioDub(Video, Audio)
|
Hard.avs:
Quote:
Video = DSS2("I:\test.webm", fps = 30, preroll = 15, lavs = "l0", lavd = "l0")
Audio = DirectShowSource("I:\test.webm", video=false)
Video = Video.ConvertToYV12()
Video = Video.Spline36Resize(720,576)
Video = Video.jm_fps(25)
AudioDub(Video, Audio)
|
And these are the AVSMeter results for plain vanilla AVS 2.61 Alpha and for the current AVS+ version:
bilder hochladen free
For me this is enough reason to not use AVS+ on this computer. It is slow enough as it is, but slowing it down even more without any additional benefit does not make sense to me.
Cheers
manolito