View Single Post
Old 3rd February 2006, 20:05   #29  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkman
That would explain a lot, but as you say it is arguable and may not always be the case. So there is a choice when calculating the SAR in that respect, I think, where some might think it is more correct to do it one way, and others the other.

Thanks for your help with my questions, btw.
When you read my posts you will see I tend not to mention terms such as SAR, PAR and DAR. This is because people tend to pre-assume their values are always "fixed".... Which they are not!

The level of "Aspect Ratio Signalling" (ARS) you will require will change in relation to your source "Movie's Aspect Ratio" (MAR) and your "mod16" pixel frame size (after cropping and resizing).

Here's an "extreme" example of what I mean. If you had an MPEG-4 file with say, a resolution of 496x464 but you knew it should be displayed at 2.35:1 shape, you could use the following calculation: -
Code:
MAR    FAR                              ARS 
47     464     21808                    1363
--  x  ---  =  -----  lowest dominator  ----  Giving an ARS value of 1363:620
20     496      9920                    620
EDIT: I forgot to include the "Extreme Example" sample.


Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |

Last edited by SeeMoreDigital; 3rd February 2006 at 22:33.
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote