Quote:
|
btw. What does PAR have to be with deshaking? some better motion estimation?
|
Far be it for me to speak for guth, but PAR affects how a rotation is performed.
0.912 is the closest AR for NTSC (I think it's actually 0.909), because of
nominal analogue blanking. What's your source, and how have you determined that the PAR is 0.888?
Quote:
|
Another thing is: is it better to crop after the deshaking?
|
You can do, but Deshaker also has the "Ignore pixels" parameters. I'm not sure which will work better, or why...
David