View Single Post
Old 13th January 2020, 14:15   #18213  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pauly Dunne View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you're getting confused about this...

I have been "watching" this, and the only instance of it having 59.94 was on the original 100mb sample's, which is wrong.

Wouldn't it depend on how the samples were compiled, for the fps to change.

The "original" VOB's are as so:-

Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 6 500 kb/s
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 4:3
Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) FPS
Standard : NTSC
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Bottom Field First
Compression mode : Lossy

I've actually got this DVD.
No I'm right. Each Field is unique which means that after deinterlacing you obtain 59.94 progressive FPS. Live concerts were often recorded like that.
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote