View Single Post
Old 2nd April 2010, 19:46   #12  |  Link
RunningSkittle
Skittle
 
RunningSkittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyomich View Post
Could you explain or argue your statement? What do you think is incorrect in MSU video codec comparisons?
High Quality encodes should not be dependent on speed?! Of course its interesting to see the speed, but to make such a high requirement kills the performance of x264. for example: No veryslow preset.
Making a floor fps requirement might be good though, 1fps is not very useful in most applications! Perhaps make it something more reasonable like 5-10fps.
it would also be interesting to see the speed/vs quality on fastest settings.

Last edited by RunningSkittle; 2nd April 2010 at 19:53.
RunningSkittle is offline   Reply With Quote