View Single Post
Old 23rd January 2020, 00:47   #2037  |  Link
benwaggoner
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul97 View Post
You're welcome.
Rav1e has still 80% 120% 340% difference in quality/bitrate in videos on arewecompressed.yet AWCY. A site that codec developers use to test.
What do those percentages mean specifically?

Quote:
SVT is too far from libaom as encoder if you see Mrsmilingwolf's user test on Reddit or on Doom9 like comparable to VP9 a bit not better. I don't know if he tests with anime or like action.
Given the configurability of SVT-AV1 in terms of quality/perf and tuning, it's hard to know what to make of encoder versus encoder comparisons. There are literally dozens of values that could impact quality. It would be more useful to compare quality at known best parameters, or quality at same bitrate and encoding time on a given system config.

It seems that there should be scenarios and highly multicore systems where SVT-AV1 would beat libaom in quality @ bitrate @ perf, just because it would have so many more MIPS/pixel available.
__________________
Ben Waggoner
Principal Video Specialist, Amazon Prime Video

My Compression Book
benwaggoner is offline   Reply With Quote