View Single Post
Old 5th January 2010, 16:27   #32  |  Link
Manao
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
It does make logical sense that packaging the (adaptive) interlacing and (adaptive) deinterlacing into the encoder should make it work better than externally - but it's more complexity: more tuning in the encoder; more work in the decoder. Has anyone ever done it?
It would be easier. It moves : resize and encode in 720p. It's static, keep 1080p and halve the framerate. You could even do that somewhat adaptively per macroblock. It would still be easier than mbaff.
__________________
Manao is offline   Reply With Quote