Quote:
Originally Posted by pinterf
Now it's to be decided that the slower h/v or v/h decision strategy should be kept or not.
Is the difference really visible and when?
|
Huh! I thought AVS's rationale made sense, but now that I think about it,
how is the visible result of the AVS sequence
400x2800->900x2800 // scale rows, copy columns
900x2800->900x400 // copy rows, scale columns
any different from zimg's
400x2800->400x400 // copy rows, scale columns
400x400->900x400 // scale rows, copy columns
Unless the two resize operations are not actually
separable?
Does
scale row n ever use pixels from the row(s) above or below? I assumed not.
(dumb question?)