I see what you're saying.... if there's switching back and forth between soft pulldown and interlaced, it'd be handled in a clever enough way to ensure a constant 23.976fps, but I had assumed the question was more general in respect to how "video" would be decimated.... in isolation, so to speak.... which is why I tried applying force film to an interlaced source earlier in the thread, and from that perspective it'd be... repeat field flags are ignored for the film sections and any video sections are decimated by dropping frames.
Last edited by hello_hello; 11th June 2017 at 04:05.
|