Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Shikari
What do you mean by "noticeable behind recode"? Quality-wise, x264 rips Recode apart, mostly because Recode is using a rather crippled Ateme encoder core from almost 5 years ago.
|
Behind in quality. I believe it is not the fault of x264, rather than "no knowledge about how to set the parameters to get better quality" on my side.
Hopefully one of the guis will encapsulate the complicated settings as Nero does. I can't really say whats better, but Nero gives my good results without tweaking and guessing on parameters. Sorry, don't wanna complain anyone here!