Quote:
Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera
Similar results
http://pclab.pl/art75073-14.html
http://www.benchmark.pl/testy_i_rece...ona/28404.html
You are expecting too much from 2xFMAC128 vs 2xFMAC256.
ThreadRipper was designed to use as many processes as possible.
See benchmarks on youtube. Gaming + streaming to youtube + twitch + encoding something in Adobe Premiere.
REMEMBER! You have to use multiple x265 encoders to fully saturate all cores with very common 1080p resolution. So in practice there is no escape from that. |
not really. In pclab test 1950X produce 7% better result than 7900X and in your test it's 2% better result for 7900X.
Moreover, I don't like handbrake test because this gui use heavy filter (avisynth?) and don't use directly stream for encoding. I prefer direct benchmark with high speed ffmpeg frameserver (less than 5% of CPU charge for stream decoding).
Try your benchmark with less instance (just to assure to have CPU charge at 100%) and you will see that speed will be higher. Perhaps higher for Intel CPU too.