Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsdr
I've nevertheless noticed a difference, not in quality, but just in the result log files.
Even if both cases are encoded with "--direct auto", and with the same parameters except the CRF/VBR part, in the result log file, i've noticed that for CRF mode, i've always a result like "Spatial : 100% Temporal : 0%".
But, in 2 pass encode, the 1rst pass is also always "Spatial : 100% Temporal : 0%". but the 2nd pass i've a "Temporal" which is not at 0. I can have for exemple "Spatial : 95% Temporal : 5%".
|
This could just be a consequence of the "fast 1st pass" setting, I think.
I would assume that with "slow 1st pass" the result for spatial/temporal would be the same.