Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Bdecided
It's not true for eye-tracked motion however - but then most modern displays are already a disaster for eye-tracked motion anyway, so it matters less.
|
Getting better all the time though. As long as we are going to put ever more computing power and algorithms into something I'd rather have it go into better motion compensated framerate conversion than better deinterlacing. With 240 Hz displays with 2 msec gray-gray I'd guess the display technology is pretty close to where no further improvements in smoothness can be perceived ... assuming good content to actually drive it at 240 Hz (where the computing power and algorithms come in).