View Single Post
Old 8th January 2010, 11:32   #51  |  Link
MfA
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Bdecided View Post
It's not true for eye-tracked motion however - but then most modern displays are already a disaster for eye-tracked motion anyway, so it matters less.
Getting better all the time though. As long as we are going to put ever more computing power and algorithms into something I'd rather have it go into better motion compensated framerate conversion than better deinterlacing. With 240 Hz displays with 2 msec gray-gray I'd guess the display technology is pretty close to where no further improvements in smoothness can be perceived ... assuming good content to actually drive it at 240 Hz (where the computing power and algorithms come in).
MfA is offline   Reply With Quote