View Single Post
Old 30th October 2013, 23:23   #20  |  Link
videofan3d
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by frencher View Post
FRIMEncode.exe ... –u 1
Just to comment, -u 1 is the highest quality, but also slowest encoding (naturally).
I was positively surprised with Intel Media encoding quality.
In general, I use only high bitrates, 24 mbit/s for 2D and 40 mbit/s for 3D (quality is most important for me).

As for test I encoded so far two of my own "3D-films" recorded by 3D-camcorder Panasonic Z10000 - and I didn't notice any ugly artefacts on this high bitrate.

x264 is probably better but it doesn't support MVC-3D (unfortunately there is no big demand for it... )
videofan3d is offline   Reply With Quote