Quote:
Originally Posted by ApTeM
I have quite an intense video clip (MJPEG, 640x480@30fps) of a stormy weather with the furious rain and wind, and even at the highest possible bitrate for this resolution (2850Kbit/sec) the resulting video in HEVC still misses a lot of details. Maybe my source isn't exactly compressible, who knows?
What's your experience with DivX HEVC implementation?
|
Just FYI, the DivX implementation was already brought up
here. And yes, the results haven't been too mind-blowing yet. That said, I wonder how much more information, settings and other things can be picked out of the actual MainConcept encoder included (mc_enc_hevc.dll) that is used in the background. After all, it does export some functions and I wouldn't be surprised if with some code you would be able to encode without the DivX application itself in the middle
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burfadel
HEVC is new that is why. Has the standard even been finalised yet? HEVC now is probably where h264 was in say, 2005.
|
Yes, the HEVC standard has been finalized. ISO/IEC is just taking it slow for whatever reason and thus they still don't have the spec ratified on their side, but ITU-T has already ratified it in April as H.265 (
spec). Bit stream was more or less frozen in January. And yes, both sides are ratifying the exact same document ^^; .
And it's more like 2003. Or possibly 2004, since the implementations are maturing somewhat faster than with AVC/H.264
.