Quote:
Originally Posted by benwaggoner
It sort of conflates encoder psychovisual tuning and bitstream capabilities. I imagine a port of x264’s psyovisual stuff to a vp9 encoder would offer big improvements, like was seen when x264 algorithms got ported into x265.
|
If this QP + arbitrary options toggling is true, then WTF I don't even. After all these years of proper methods being discussed and after their inclusion in AOM which should give them more expertise in this, they should know better.
I would start to suspect actual malice here (marketing/PR deciding the results here?). Because they are really jumping through hoops here to not use the encoders in a way they are supposed with that QP bullshit.