Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - HE-AAC Nero!

kotuwa · 17th March 2016, 00:07

Thanks.
In above graph, if they used nero, they could have go at least for 96kbps limit in HE. Then it would be more clear.
Apple AAC limit HE at 80kbps, thought nero with higher bitrate will do better... at least at -q 0.35.

Regarding above test in graph, it a vocal / dialogue based test?
That USAC looks like the best! All rounder for low and high bitrates!

Also I remember a comment which said something like this... ~"LC part of a 80kbps HE sounded better than 112kbps LC's" !!!
Can not remember it from where.... How about it's validity !?

17th March 2016, 00:07	#4 \| Link
kotuwa Registered User Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 66	Thanks. In above graph, if they used nero, they could have go at least for 96kbps limit in HE. Then it would be more clear. Apple AAC limit HE at 80kbps, thought nero with higher bitrate will do better... at least at -q 0.35. Regarding above test in graph, it a vocal / dialogue based test? That USAC looks like the best! All rounder for low and high bitrates! Also I remember a comment which said something like this... ~"LC part of a 80kbps HE sounded better than 112kbps LC's" !!! Can not remember it from where.... How about it's validity !?