The way I understand it (which could be wrong), for just the underlined section, it's effectively:
1-2-2-3-0-1-2-3-0-1-2-0-1-3-3 = bff - bff+rff - tff - bff - bff+rff - tff+rff - tff+rff
Which was automatically corrected to
1-2-2-3-0-1-2-3-0-1-3-0-1-2-3 = bff - bff+rff - tff+rff - bff - bff+rff - tff - tff+rff
When anyone liking nice orderly patterns can see the result should be:
1-2-3-0-1-2-3-0-1-2-3-0-1-2-3 = bff+rff - tff - tff+rff - bff - bff+rff - tff - tff+rff
And without ANY idea what the images look like or where they are in the video?
Seems dubious to me, but it's not the sort of thing I'd tend to think about. Isn't that what TFM() is for?
Last edited by hello_hello; 17th February 2017 at 21:23.
|