Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs
That just means that no ratio was used during the VFR-->CFR reencode and 1:1 is assumed. No big deal, as the aspect information is kept separately (720x480=3:2). Pseudo-BD structures are meant only as an in-between, and they also aren't very efficiently encoded (translated --> near-lossless and very big) to be quicker. But I can add the ratio information to the VFR-->CFR encode easy enough.
I'm going to look at the timecodes more closely to see where the anomalies are.
|
Well... it just get's weirder when you look at it. Since the original rate was 23.976 there should be a little less than 42 milliseconds between pictures. But it appears to alternate between 33-34ms interval for one picture, followed by a 50ms interval for the next. That would average out right... but I've never seen anything like that. Then the last two frames have an interval of 0ms. I had my code count the frames... and the total seems right.