Quote:
Originally Posted by Motenai Yoda
1- interlaced encoding usually is more efficient than encoding interlaced content as progressive, but it's still less efficient than encoding progressive content as progressive;
2- qtgmc include a denoiser, you can try with its losselss mode;
3- doubling framerate usually give almost identical couples of frames so don't take so much bitrate.
|
1. I'm talking about encoding progressive as progressive (50p) and interlaced video as interlaced (--tff option for x264).
2. denoiser included with QTGMC enabled by default ?
3. Yes, deinterlacing with doubling framerate produce 2 almost indetial frames (with minimum difference) instead of 1 frame (interlaced with 2 fields).