Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - InpaintDelogo - advanced logo removal & hardcoded subtitles extraction

manolito · 10th September 2019, 01:29

Thanks for these benchmarks, but as I said before, they do not mean a thing to me. If the overall speed including decoding, AVS script plus encoding gives me an identical speed for Turbo=1 and Turbo=3, why in the world would I try to use the method which supposedly results in a lower quality? Makes no sense to me...

For the AutoMask feature when I want to get a better speed I was under the impression (from reading the doc) that I cannot use the "Analyze" parameter when I use the "Mode=Inpaint" parameter. And this is the only mode I ever use.

I tested it using "AutoMask=1" and "Analyze=1" and "Mode=Inpaint" in the command for creating the mask, and indeed the "Analyze=1" parameter was ignored. Creating the mask took just as long as without the "Analyze=1" parameter, and the resulting mask looked the same.

10th September 2019, 01:29	#35 \| Link
manolito Registered User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Berlin, Germany Posts: 3,079	Thanks for these benchmarks, but as I said before, they do not mean a thing to me. If the overall speed including decoding, AVS script plus encoding gives me an identical speed for Turbo=1 and Turbo=3, why in the world would I try to use the method which supposedly results in a lower quality? Makes no sense to me... For the AutoMask feature when I want to get a better speed I was under the impression (from reading the doc) that I cannot use the "Analyze" parameter when I use the "Mode=Inpaint" parameter. And this is the only mode I ever use. I tested it using "AutoMask=1" and "Analyze=1" and "Mode=Inpaint" in the command for creating the mask, and indeed the "Analyze=1" parameter was ignored. Creating the mask took just as long as without the "Analyze=1" parameter, and the resulting mask looked the same.