Quote:
Originally Posted by feisty2
before the time that modern digital cameras like Arri Alexa were introduced, the image quality of any non-film based material is basically garbage. back then you gotta use film cameras like Arriflex 435 to shoot high quality videos. since footages shot on film are apparently progressive, that leaves all native interlaced content nothing but abysmal quality, which is not worth saving anyways.
|
That's where I have to disagree with you. The quality may be dismal but quality is just one component. What is recorded may be interesting and valuable despite the bad quality.
So no, I disagree that some things are not worthy to be saved because of a bad quality.