Quote:
Originally Posted by poisondeathray
Not necessarily spatial only; deinterlacing can use temporal algorithms (e.g. QTGMC does)
|
Bobbing got its name from what the the spatial-only versions did. This does NOT imply that all bob-deinterlacing is spatial-only, nor did I say that it did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poisondeathray
Interlaced content means each field represents a different moment in time. 59.94 different moments in time represented
|
No, interlaced content means that the content has interlacing in it. How that interlacing got there is irrelevant. If a VOB file is encoded as 24 fps with soft pulldown, and I index it in DGindex with "honor pulldown flags", bam, it's interlaced now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poisondeathray
The problem is you're mixing up Inverse telecine or pulldown removal with Deinterlacing. These are different things.
|
I didn't get them mixed up. I know they're different things. But one is a subset of the other.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poisondeathray
So if you want to use your own definition, you are wrong
|
I'm sorry but your definitions are wrong. Deinterlacing is any process that converts interlaced content to progressive. Bobbing is a form of deinterlacing. Field-matching (which is the first step of IVTC) is also deinterlacing. Blur(1.0) is a form of deinterlacing.