Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted)

aufkrawall · 10th July 2015, 18:43

Some more NNEDI3 vs super-xbr doubling test. Sorry about the image size, I don't know how to crop always exactly the same pixels.
However, I could do this in future if someone explained this to me.

720p -> WQHD, Jinc3AR chroma

super-xbr 100 is sharper than NNEDI3 64, but ringing gets more obvious and lines aren't as clean.
NNEDI3 64:

super-xbr 100:

With AdaptiveSharpen of 0.2 as an upscaling refinement for NNEDI3, the image still looks natural and clean, but is sharper than super-xbr 100 without sharpen:

Edit: as a reference, the original frame:
http://abload.de/img/frame6ro6g.png

I also notice the worse line reconstruction of super-xbr e.g. with clothes of news speakers.
Even though it's "just" doubling, the advantage of NNEDI3 is already noticeable.

10th July 2015, 18:43	#31644 \| Link
aufkrawall Registered User Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 1,812	Some more NNEDI3 vs super-xbr doubling test. Sorry about the image size, I don't know how to crop always exactly the same pixels. However, I could do this in future if someone explained this to me. 720p -> WQHD, Jinc3AR chroma super-xbr 100 is sharper than NNEDI3 64, but ringing gets more obvious and lines aren't as clean. NNEDI3 64: super-xbr 100: With AdaptiveSharpen of 0.2 as an upscaling refinement for NNEDI3, the image still looks natural and clean, but is sharper than super-xbr 100 without sharpen: Edit: as a reference, the original frame: http://abload.de/img/frame6ro6g.png I also notice the worse line reconstruction of super-xbr e.g. with clothes of news speakers. Even though it's "just" doubling, the advantage of NNEDI3 is already noticeable. Last edited by aufkrawall; 10th July 2015 at 18:50.