View Single Post
Old 4th October 2018, 05:08   #1069  |  Link
jonatans
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by blurred View Post
- https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/...d-webm-license : "Unfortunately, the interaction between the copyright license and the patent license made the result GPL-incompatible. Based on the concerns of developers writing GPL-covered software, Google publicly stated that they would take some time to review the WebM license and try to address the community's concerns. Today, they released a revised license, and it is GPL-compatible."
"The most important part of the change is that Google has separated the patent license from the copyright license. Now the copyright license on the software is a totally standard three-clause BSD license, which is clearly compatible with the GPL. The patent license, in turn, provides distributors with permission to exercise all the rights, and meet all the conditions, in the GPL, as required by GPLv2 section 7; and those permissions are consistent with the ones provided by the patent grant in GPLv3 section 11. All this means that developers distributing GPL-covered software can take advantage of the patent license without running afoul of the GPL's conditions, whether they're using GPLv2 or GPLv3."

Does it still apply to AV1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TD-Linux View Post
Yes, it does.
Well.. the problem still applies to AV1. But the solution does not

In WebM, the software license and patent license are clearly separated https://www.webmproject.org/license/ "The WebM codec source code and specification are licensed differently."

In AOM, the software license and patent license are clearly combined https://aomedia.org/license/ "Software released by the Alliance for Open Media is made available under a combination of the following licenses"
__________________
Jonatan Samuelsson
Co-founder and CEO at Divideon

www.divideon.com | xvc.io
jonatans is offline   Reply With Quote