View Single Post
Old 23rd May 2020, 01:26   #397  |  Link
Stereodude
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by hello_hello View Post
Complete nonsense. TFM field matches the film sections as it always would and only replaces the combed pixels by taking them from the de-interlaced clip in exactly the same way every other example of your method does.

Funnily enough, if lower TFM threshold settings caused it to take more pixels from the QTGMC de-interlaced clip you regularly claim not to like, despite all the evidence posted previously showing it can be better (which you've continually ignored) you're saying that would be better?

The final instance of QTGMC isn't de-interlacing, just smoothing the output.
Careful, that's really not how TFM works. TFM doesn't replace pixels. It replaces entire lines of pixels. The TFM help file is misleading IMHO. I thought it only replaced the small areas of the frame that have detected interlacing. Like it made a mask of the moving part and would leave the underlying image. I'm nearly certain that it replaces the entire line for any line that has has detected interlacing in it. So in content like this DS9 stuff it's basically replacing the entire frame even if you're using PP>=5.

It may even be replacing anything between the top most line and bottom most line that have detected interlacing in them.
Stereodude is offline   Reply With Quote