Quote:
Originally Posted by ShogoXT
I have been treating this thread as an all in one encoding hardware implementations thread anyway.
I read that PDF,a couple of things. It's nice that they still are expanding features, but most of it seems to be about cuda accellerated encoding in the later half. Wasn't opencl and cuda acceleration shown to be worse for quality? Also those YouTube pictures are funny is it trying to demonstrate blocking artifacts.
https://blog.parsecgaming.com/nvidia...s-713b9e1e048a
More evidence that vce is very far behind. On Reddit I try to help people with encoding settings on OBS and most people don't believe me that nvenc is decent and vce is not so good compared to say x264 very fast.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Core_Next
Has anyone seen this? Apparently it was put into the Raven Ridge APU. |
So far, nvidia adaptive GOP, adaptive IPB frame placement, lookahead and AQ (spatial and temporal) which technically are based on CUDA seem to work well. It depends on the implementation I guess.
Intel also has some sort of adaptive GOP, lookahead and IPB placements.
The greatest feature added by Nvidia and Intel is "constant quality" rate control mode (vbr-quality = nvidia , ICQ = intel)
No idea what is AMD doing with its VCE.
The youtube example is funny indeed, but the second picture sets with a picture of a man = Elecard HEVCAnalyzer? Before it was discontinued and acquired by adobe? Hmm....