DG NV tools

meatwad · 17th July 2010, 01:30

I just upgraded to a gtx 470 and I was amazed at the improvement it had with DG NV Tools. The same clip with the same settings was done on the same machine with different video cards.

9600 GSO 512 MB:

encoded 16046 frames, 45.07 fps, 2053.91 kb/s

------------------------------------------------------------
x264 Statistics
------------------------------------------------------------

Start: 3:24:02 PM
End: 3:29:58 PM
Duration: 00:05:56

GTX 470 1280 MB:

encoded 16046 frames, 48.92 fps, 2082.12 kb/s

------------------------------------------------------------
x264 Statistics
------------------------------------------------------------

Start: 6:51:56 PM
End: 6:57:25 PM
Duration: 00:05:28

The X264 profile used was Divx Plus. Anyway, that's a good improvement over the 9600 GSO I had and the 210 I tried was even lower. I haven't tested the 470 with DXVA decoders yet. I'm only posting this because I didn't think I'd see that much improvement. If you're doing a long encode, those 3-4 fps will come in handy. Also, this is the 32 bit version. I'll test the 64 bit when I get a chance. Also, all the info you gave me in a previous post proved quite helpful neuron2--Thanks.

17th July 2010, 01:30	#10 \| Link
meatwad Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 106	I just upgraded to a gtx 470 and I was amazed at the improvement it had with DG NV Tools. The same clip with the same settings was done on the same machine with different video cards. 9600 GSO 512 MB: encoded 16046 frames, 45.07 fps, 2053.91 kb/s ------------------------------------------------------------ x264 Statistics ------------------------------------------------------------ Start: 3:24:02 PM End: 3:29:58 PM Duration: 00:05:56 GTX 470 1280 MB: encoded 16046 frames, 48.92 fps, 2082.12 kb/s ------------------------------------------------------------ x264 Statistics ------------------------------------------------------------ Start: 6:51:56 PM End: 6:57:25 PM Duration: 00:05:28 The X264 profile used was Divx Plus. Anyway, that's a good improvement over the 9600 GSO I had and the 210 I tried was even lower. I haven't tested the 470 with DXVA decoders yet. I'm only posting this because I didn't think I'd see that much improvement. If you're doing a long encode, those 3-4 fps will come in handy. Also, this is the 32 bit version. I'll test the 64 bit when I get a chance. Also, all the info you gave me in a previous post proved quite helpful neuron2--Thanks.