RipBot264 v1.18.3 - Simple and easy to use GUI -> IPOD . PSP . CONSOLES . BLURAY

[illestdomer2005]

Originally Posted by benjyv

Hi ,

I know that Ripbot 264 has included eac3to .
I need to resize few files which are too large after encoding BD into 720p.
Resulting 3 files : a LPCM of 2 GB , a DTS of 987 MB and an AC3 of 980 MB.
I wanna convert them to maximum 200-300 MB each , doesn't matter the quality ( I know the problem )
So , in this case , can I use Ripbot ?? and how ??
If no , I must use eac3to , but I didn't found yet an interface for it...

can smb help me ???

THX !!

PS : One MORE question :

When a movie has 4 or 5 sound tracks , how can I encode ALL of them , in the same time using Ripbot ???
Is there such a possibility ???
If there isn't , how can I encode / convert them separatelly and how can I attach them to the movie ??

Use this as a GUI for eac3to to convert your audio tracks:

eac3to GUI

You can use tsMuxer to demux audio tracks and convert them separately. tsMuxer can also remux the video, audio, and subtitle files if you want separate versions. It will do MKVs and AVCHDs.

[benjyv]

I see that you didn't understand my problem (

Can I encode IN THE SAME TIME 2 , 3 or 4 sound tracks using Ripbot ???...like subtitles , for instance....
I think NO ...also every DTS or other kind of sound tracks is automatically converted to AC3 file.
My problem is how to resize the sound files ???
Does eac3to has an interface to easy work with it ???

[heliocentric]

Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera

25mbps is enough for movies

23866 MB (bd-sl) = 24438784 KB

25000kbps (video) + 4608kbps (uncompressed 5.1 audio 16bit) = 29608kbps = 3701KB/s
24438784 / 3701 = 6603 s / 60 = 110 min

i was converting the audio track to dd 5.1 to free up room for a higher video birate though

[dbone1026]

Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera

You should use 1080p subs because they will look better on 1920x1080 display.

Keep in mind though that some players (such as the PCH A200/C200) do not support 1080p subs in mkvs currently. I have to downres them to 480p

EDIT - nevermind, you are talking about burned in subs, I am talking about IDX/SUB subs muxed in

[doublem70]

Originally Posted by soneca

Maurizio,

Try this > http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...09#post1387509

Thanks, now it seems work correctly. This night I try AVCHD conversion. Bye bye

[soneca]

My problem is how to resize the sound files ???

You have several options to leave these files with smaller size using both RipBot as eac3to.

Does eac3to has an interface to easy work with it ???

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=135095

[benjyv]

Thx soneca for that link but it'll take an year to read and to test all they write there....
let put a simple question :
can Ripbot convert just sound files , without image files ???
if yes , tell me HOW ,pls !!!

[soneca]

Can do otherwise, only video.
But to convert only the audio will have to use eacto3.
This tutorial can help > http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/3...-MKV-720P-file

[benjyv]

THANKS a lot !!!

[stax76]

@Atak_Snajpera

I hardly encode these days not even with StaxRip but since I got a new monitor I'm playing around now with different applications checking how fonts look. Until today I had 17" 1024x768 analog monitor, a good Samsung SyncMaster. In RipBot264 fonts were very hard to read, I remember you said you expect people to have a good LCD so I though problem is probably my analog monitor. Now I have a Samsung P2370 which is 23" at 1920x1080 using 150% system font size, it looks just as bad as before , very hard to read. In the 'Encoding settings' dialog, fonts look really really bad here. You probably have perfect eye sight and a perfectly adjusted high quality LCD but I guarantee you there are countless users were things look very very bad due to bad eyes, bad monitor or both. My eye sight is poor, I'm 34 now and sadly it gets a little bit worse every year.

[Dislikeyou]

Originally Posted by stax76

@Atak_Snajpera

I hardly encode these days not even with StaxRip but since I got a new monitor I'm playing around now with different applications checking how fonts look. Until today I had 17" 1024x768 analog monitor, a good Samsung SyncMaster. In RipBot264 fonts were very hard to read, I remember you said you expect people to have a good LCD so I though problem is probably my analog monitor. Now I have a Samsung P2370 which is 23" at 1920x1080 using 150% system font size, it looks just as bad as before , very hard to read. In the 'Encoding settings' dialog, fonts look really really bad here. You probably have perfect eye sight and a perfectly adjusted high quality LCD but I guarantee you there are countless users were things look very very bad due to bad eyes, bad monitor or both. My eye sight is poor, I'm 34 now and sadly it gets a little bit worse every year.

The font is ok for me.. small but i can read it fine.. Full HD Samsung monitor on windows 7..

[cafevincent]

Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera

A week? I've just finished encoding Avatar in less than 5h. Default level 4.0 , 1280x720 ,CRF22 and everything on my old Q6600@3Ghz I think you should stick to defaults. 2-pass use only if you have logical reasons.

I forgot the original setting for subpixel refinement. How do I reset the encoder settings?

Also, shouldn't I use AVC level 4.1 for DXVA or even 5.1 because I'm using nVidia Ion for decoding?

[Atak_Snajpera]

@stax76
this test will tell you how good display you have there http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
in contrast test I see all steps
in black levels i see all blocks. even number 1.
in white saturation I barely see 252. 253 and 254 is not visible for me.

and everything on my old LG monitor (contrast and brightness set at 65%)


font color is 160,160,160 on 255,255,255 background. You should be able to see them very well.

My eye sight is poor, I'm 34 now and sadly it gets a little bit worse every year.

Save some money for laser eye correction. I paid only 1200 euro for both eyes in Poland.

[stax76]

@Atak_Snajpera

After some monitor corrections according to your test it looks better, still a bit difficult but better.

[MKVCrazy]

Is it possible to run multiple instances of RipBot264 ? (I've got a very powerful CPU, so I don't want to waste it )

[Atak_Snajpera]

I didn't know that x264 is not multithreaded.

[MKVCrazy]

Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera

I didn't know that x264 is not multithreaded.

lol, I know you're mad when someone asks you "easy" things but I do know x264 can run silumtaneously (I do that all the time in MeGUI with multiple workers) but in RipBot264, when I click on RipBot264.exe one more time, it keeps saying it's still in memory! So it won't open up another RipBot264. That's why I asked if it's possible to do the same like MeGUI or not since I'm not completely familiar with RipBot264 yet.

[benjyv]

Originally Posted by MKVCrazy

lol, I know you're mad when someone asks you "easy" things but I do know x264 can run silumtaneously (I do that all the time in MeGUI with multiple workers) but in RipBot264, when I click on RipBot264.exe one more time, it keeps saying it's still in memory! So it won't open up another RipBot264. That's why I asked if it's possible to do the same like MeGUI or not since I'm not completely familiar with RipBot264 yet.

You're right !! MeGUI can run / work with multiple workers , but Ripbot - NO.
It occupies the entire memory or processor and two parallel programs can not work.
Moreover the software has been designed to ease your work and not obstruct it..
Supposing you could run two or three programs at once, during the encoding , logic , the time will increase proportionally, no matter how powerful your computer should be..

[MKVCrazy]

Originally Posted by benjyv

You're right !! MeGUI can run / work with multiple workers , but Ripbot - NO.
It occupies the entire memory or processor and two parallel programs can not work.
Moreover the software has been designed to ease your work and not obstruct it..
Supposing you could run two or three programs at once, during the encoding , logic , the time will increase proportionally, no matter how powerful your computer should be..

uhm, ah I see why RipBot won't run in parallel now.

@the time will increase proportionally

I don't know how RipBot264 will be programmed to run in parallel later in the future but if it's going to be like MeGUI, then the time won't increase for me. I have tried converting 4 HD (1080p) videos at the same time and they all encoded as fast as if I were running a single conversion.

By the way, can the speed of conversion ruin my output quality? Because I am still using the same profile as before (I got 25-30 fps conversion speed) and now when I use this profile on a faster computer it goes up to like 120-140 fps) :\ I like the speed increase but just want to confirm it if quality can be worse before I make profile a little heavier.

[cubanresourceful]

I've mirrored the file here: http://techmunchies.net/forums/index...pbot264-v1151/

I will continue to update the mirror when new releases come out.