Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 AVC / H.264
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19th February 2012, 17:28   #7001  |  Link
robpdotcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 297
Wow, I assumed everyone preferred to only have forced subs load automatically.... guess I was wrong.
__________________
Windows 7 x64
i7 870
16GB RAM
AMD 6870
robpdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2012, 17:58   #7002  |  Link
Shevek
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by robpdotcom View Post
Wow, I assumed everyone preferred to only have forced subs load automatically.... guess I was wrong.
Isn't that the point of the default flag?

if a subs stream is set to default it will display automatically.

if no subs stream is set to default none will display automatically.

That's what I do with my Studio Ghibli rips.

default audio is English, 2nd audio is Japanese, single English subs with default flag off.

That way, when the children watch it they get the English audio and no subs, but when I watch it I switch audio to Japanese and switch the subs on.

At least that's my experience using VLC.
Shevek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2012, 19:34   #7003  |  Link
Pat357
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by CruNcher View Post
yep normaly Mainconcept does excellent work but the VC-1 Decoder is far from that and it's funny seeing Cyberlink and Arcsoft beating it but i guess Mainconcept doesn't invest much resources into it's Developing
What's the name of the Cyberlink VC-1 decoder (filter name on the disk).
I have PDVD9 installed (came with my system), but can't find the VC-1 decoding filter.
Pat357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 02:37   #7004  |  Link
kerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Does anyone get dxva on AMD cards activated? I have an HD6950 with latest CCC 12.1 and win7x64. I have checked dxva on properties, but tray icon is always on blue.

Any ideas?
kerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 12:04   #7005  |  Link
DeadlyEmbrace
Registered User
 
DeadlyEmbrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerman View Post
Does anyone get dxva on AMD cards activated? I have an HD6950 with latest CCC 12.1 and win7x64. I have checked dxva on properties, but tray icon is always on blue.

Any ideas?
Are you using a DXVA supported renderer? (EVR or EVR-CP)?
Also, if I remember correctly you cannot have a subtitle filter (directVobSub or such) running between the DXVA decoder and the renderer.
DeadlyEmbrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 14:30   #7006  |  Link
kerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadlyEmbrace View Post
Are you using a DXVA supported renderer? (EVR or EVR-CP)?
Also, if I remember correctly you cannot have a subtitle filter (directVobSub or such) running between the DXVA decoder and the renderer.
Yes, madVR. No subtitle filter, I just switch subtitloes on/off with splitter.
kerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 14:47   #7007  |  Link
namaiki
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerman View Post
Yes, madVR. No subtitle filter, I just switch subtitloes on/off with splitter.
madVR doesn't support DXVA for video decoding. Only DXVA deinterlace.
namaiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 15:08   #7008  |  Link
kerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
I thought it was the coreavc the only one involved on decoding and hw acceleration used for it. Then the render filter just renders the result, inherent to how the decoder does his specific task.

BTW, is it much of use in quality terms the choice for a specific render for 1:1 video displaying? I mean, 1080p content on 1080p display.

Last edited by kerman; 20th February 2012 at 15:10.
kerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 16:10   #7009  |  Link
ajp_anton
Registered User
 
ajp_anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stockholm/Helsinki
Posts: 805
With DXVA, everything happens on the GPU. The renderer must support the transfer of decoded video within the GPU, instead of the "normal" way to send the decoded video *to* the GPU for rendering.

1:1 is only 1:1 for the luma pixels. For 99.9% of all video you watch, the chroma resolution is half (or 1/4th by area), so it needs to be upscaled.
ajp_anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 18:19   #7010  |  Link
kerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajp_anton View Post
1:1 is only 1:1 for the luma pixels. For 99.9% of all video you watch, the chroma resolution is half (or 1/4th by area), so it needs to be upscaled.
On untouched Bluray video, chroma is half resolution too?

madVR may not support DXVA... but it does CUDA? with nvidia gpu, coreavc does enable CUDA hardware acceleration with madVR.
kerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2012, 19:01   #7011  |  Link
DeadlyEmbrace
Registered User
 
DeadlyEmbrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 34
Yes, MadVR does work with CUDA. As far as I understand it CUDA copies the processed frames back to system RAM where the renderer can get at them, kinda like the LAV DXVA Copy Back option.
DeadlyEmbrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 04:37   #7012  |  Link
BetaBoy
CoreCodec Founder
 
BetaBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetaBoy View Post
CruNcher.. got it... fixed, thx.
I spoke too soon... we are looking into this some more.
__________________
Dan "BetaBoy" Marlin
Ubiquitous Multimedia Technologies and Developer Tools

http://corecodec.com
BetaBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 05:24   #7013  |  Link
dead_screem
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 105
I know you commented already, but you didn't really affirm the previously mentioned "Feburary" release as per twitter... So is 3.1 still on track for a Feburary release? or has the moving target moved over to March?

And what is the status on CoreAAC? I know you got CoreAVC 4:4:4 and 4:2:2 on your plate as well as CoreMVC, But there is a pretty bad channel order bug I mentioned to you before (and you passed it on to the team I guess), that makes CoreAAC completely unusable for anything but 2 channel stereo, even mono is screwed up.
We can't even use an external 5.1>2.0 downmix because CoreAAC is not using the correct internal channel order and thus the channels are output wrong. And Mono is not output correctly as 1 channel, it's output as 2 channel Stereo but with audio in only 1 channel.

Last edited by dead_screem; 21st February 2012 at 05:36.
dead_screem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 06:40   #7014  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by betaking View Post
Microsoft>Cyberlink>Arcsoft>Mainconcept!
Where does libavcodec fit on that list?
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 07:02   #7015  |  Link
CruNcher
Registered User
 
CruNcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetaBoy View Post
I spoke too soon... we are looking into this some more.
yep this is a little crazy especially the complete different handling of different decoder splitter combinations, though Kytmanov with his ffmpeg or libav based AV Splitter handles it well with CoreAVC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Shikari View Post
Where does libavcodec fit on that list?
I guess he doesn't see it up to the state of the commercial implementations because of the missing interlaced handling part how is the status of that btw for libavcodec now ?
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :)

It is about Time

Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late !

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004

Last edited by CruNcher; 21st February 2012 at 07:07.
CruNcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 07:12   #7016  |  Link
nevcairiel
Registered Developer
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Shikari View Post
Where does libavcodec fit on that list?
libavcodecs VC-1 decoder is not really up to par. It lacks proper interlaced support and is generally slow.

If those two things would be fixed, it would probably be OK, so that means finishing interlaced decoding, and adding multi-threading for the speed issues.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders
nevcairiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 07:19   #7017  |  Link
CruNcher
Registered User
 
CruNcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
and maybe trying to find a way to fix this old http://www.mediafire.com/?lh785fl24aukxja Microsoft Encoder bug (or old feature implementation) that would make it unique as everyone else has failed yet on it (only Microsofts Decoder copes with it) most probably because they only look @ the official specs
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :)

It is about Time

Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late !

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004

Last edited by CruNcher; 21st February 2012 at 07:25.
CruNcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2012, 13:04   #7018  |  Link
Midzuki
Unavailable
 
Midzuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: offline
Posts: 1,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Shikari View Post
Where does libavcodec fit on that list?
Faster than Mainconcept's decoder anyway.
Midzuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2012, 07:31   #7019  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
I've finished my benchmark survey.

All platforms included (ATI, Nvidia, Intel) and the main decoders:

Microsoft DirectShow,
Microsoft MediaFoundation,
LAV Video all modes (NVCUVID, QuickSync decoder, DXVA2 Copy-back, DXVA2 Native),
CoreAVC (NVCUVID, DXVA2),
FFDShow QuickSync decoder.

Results here:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=163110
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2012, 11:01   #7020  |  Link
CruNcher
Registered User
 
CruNcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
This is only 1 Side of the Medal though as i explained in the Benchmark thread
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :)

It is about Time

Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late !

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004
CruNcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
codec, coreavc, corecodec, coremvc, cuda, decoder, dxva, h.264, mvc, scam


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.