Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
3rd July 2019, 02:25 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 232
|
About Bluray
Hi guys I have mi collection of Bluray movies that I like to have in MKV so I use MakeMKV for convert the Bluray to a MKV file
The thing is this MKV size is (depending of the movie of course) 28gb, 35gb, 42gb etc I use Handbrake with CRF to reduce the size of the MKV file keeping the best quality possible so I can keep a copy of that movies on a hard disc So far when I got an MKV movie previously maked from Bluray and the size is almost (or more than) 28gb I use Bd rebuilder for encoding to BD25 so I get a smaller size so then I use Handbrake for reduce the size (Just in case I donīt use BD rebuilder because I donīt know why I get image and audio problems when I play it) So, my question here is, all this Iīm doing I mean, if the MKV from Bluray the size is as an example 42gb and I use directly Handbrake to reduce with CRF, Iīll obtain the same quality that can I have if I previously reencode with BD rebuilder to BD25 ? Iīm so sorry guys I canīt find another way to ask All I need to know is if the MKV file is too big, if this file I directly encode with Handbrake with CRF, the final quality will be the same if I previously reencode first with BD rebuilder to BD25 for get the file some smaller? it matters? Thank you for your pacience guys and I really hope you can helping me Thank you in advance!! Last edited by Blurayhd; 3rd July 2019 at 02:28. |
3rd July 2019, 06:14 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
You would need to use the same settings in both programs. BD rebuilder is also using x264, similar to Handbrake, so they will be the same quality at the same settings. They might be using different versions of x264 which would could cause very minor differences but x264 is very mature now.
However, CRF is unlikely to give you the exact size you need to fill the BD so BD rebuilder could improve quality by using two pass and targeting a larger size. If the end result of your Handbrake encode is 20GB but BD rebuilder's was 24GB BD rebuilder would be better quality, again assuming the same preset and tuning was used.
__________________
madVR options explained |
3rd July 2019, 22:37 | #3 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
I notice with one MKV movie that I convert with High and Main and hight get me a file size 1gb more than Main, I just donīt undestand witch one is better? Thank you again for helping me Last edited by Blurayhd; 4th July 2019 at 02:43. |
|
4th July 2019, 03:13 | #4 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
High profile is better. The difference between main and high is not big but almost all devices that support HD H.264 support high profile.
Quote:
__________________
madVR options explained |
|
5th July 2019, 00:11 | #5 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
I encode same movie as an example with Main and High and High isl most 1gb more size, for that I donīt get clear what really differente is there? I mean, depending of Main or High is about size and quality? or si about if the TV eventualy will play this MKV? |
|
7th July 2019, 20:22 | #6 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,771
|
Quote:
Using the same CRF might give different output sizes, which would indicate you can use a higher CRF with High than Main for your content. |
|
|
|