Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > (HD) DVD, Blu-ray & (S)VCD > DVD & BD Rebuilder

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st November 2019, 04:11   #29001  |  Link
AmigaFuture
Registered User
 
AmigaFuture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Within the main Source.
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike-uk View Post
noticed when encoding its using the 32bit version of x264 ?? why is it not using 64 bit

also how do you add stuff to the avisynth script, i want to enable the MT mode ?

Thanks
I've noticed that, and I've wondered why "it's" not doing it also. The rest is redundant.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave; but rather to skid out broadside, thoroughly used, torn and warn and loudly proclaim; WOW; What a ride!!! Soon, I'm going to do it AGAiN in different skin!!
AmigaFuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2019, 23:10   #29002  |  Link
Michi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 62
Error on Wizard of OZ:

Code:
[11.21.19] BD Rebuilder v0.60.29
[19:50:51] Source:  WIZARD_OF_OZ
  - Input BD size: 77,81 GB
  - Approximate total content: [02:46:04.245]
  - Target BD size: 46,26 GB
  - Windows Version: 6.2 [9200]
  - Quality: Good (Fastest, BD-25+), ABR
  - Decoding/Frame serving: FFMPEG
  - Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=448
[19:50:51] PHASE ONE, Encoding
 - [19:50:51] Processing: VID_00000 (1 of 9)
 - [19:50:51] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00000]
 - [19:50:55] Reencoding video [VID_00000]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 3840x2160
   - Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 486 frames
   - Bitrate: 12.895 Kbs
 - [19:50:55] Reencoding: VID_00000, Pass 1 of 1
 - [19:51:23] Video Encode complete
 - [19:51:23] Processing audio tracks
 - [19:51:23] Multiplexing M2TS
 - [19:51:27] Processing: VID_00001 (2 of 9)
 - [19:51:27] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00001]
 - [19:51:31] Reencoding video [VID_00001]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 3840x2160
   - Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 457 frames
   - Bitrate: 5.393 Kbs
 - [19:51:31] Reencoding: VID_00001, Pass 1 of 1
 - [19:51:57] Video Encode complete
 - [19:51:57] Processing audio tracks
 - [19:51:57] Multiplexing M2TS
 - [19:52:00] Processing: VID_00002 (3 of 9)
 - [19:52:01] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00002]
 - [19:53:56] Reencoding video [VID_00002]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 1920x1080
   - Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 74.301 frames
   - Bitrate: 32.449 Kbs
 - [19:53:56] Reencoding: VID_00002, Pass 1 of 1
 - [20:13:41] Video Encode complete
 - [20:13:41] Processing audio tracks
   - Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio
 - [20:13:41] Multiplexing M2TS
 - [20:18:53] Processing: VID_00004 (4 of 9)
 - [20:18:53] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00004]
 - [20:19:00] Reencoding video [VID_00004]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 3840x2160
   - Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 8.160 frames
   - Bitrate: 8.020 Kbs
 - [20:19:00] Reencoding: VID_00004, Pass 1 of 1
 - [20:26:27] Video Encode complete
 - [20:26:27] Processing audio tracks
 - [20:26:27] Multiplexing M2TS
 - [20:26:39] Processing: VID_00007 (5 of 9)
 - [20:26:39] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00007]
 - [20:31:17] Reencoding video [VID_00007]
   - Source Video: HEVC, 3840x2160
   - Rate/Length: 23,976fps, 146.383 frames
   - Bitrate: 35.000 Kbs
 - [20:31:17] Reencoding: VID_00007, Pass 1 of 1
 - [22:56:20] Video Encode complete
 - [22:56:20] Processing audio tracks
   - Track 4354 (deu): Keeping original audio
 - [22:56:20] Multiplexing M2TS
 - Error in attempt to multiplex: MUX_00007.meta
 - Bitstream exception Unknown exception. It does not have to be! Please contact application support team for more information.
[22:56:44] - Failed to build structure, aborted
Michi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2019, 02:12   #29003  |  Link
Alleycat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 9
I rebuilt a concert blu-ray which had 720 x 480i mpeg 2 source with a 16:9 display aspect ratio. I noticed that the rebuilt version has small black bars at the top and bottom and the picture was of reduced height (slightly squashed) compared to the original. When I used the hidden option show_encoder=1, x264 reported the following: "lav [info]: 720x480i 32:27 @ 30000/101 fps (cfr)"
I could see that bd-rb was then telling x264 to use SAR=40/33 when doing the re-code, which I believe is the cause of this problem. Is there a way of forcing bd-rb to preserve the original SAR value?
Alleycat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2019, 07:51   #29004  |  Link
prologic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 11
Tried to remux Game of thrones S8 disc1(BLURAY) , Bd rebuilder came back with , error reading disc .. went back to version 60.04 and all read ok

Last edited by prologic; 22nd November 2019 at 08:02.
prologic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2019, 17:36   #29005  |  Link
Ch3vr0n
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by prologic View Post
Tried to remux Game of thrones S8 disc1(BLURAY) , Bd rebuilder came back with , error reading disc .. went back to version 60.04 and all read ok
Now how about you post the encoding log of the build that fails, so @jdobbs actually has something to work with and maybe fix?
Ch3vr0n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2019, 18:21   #29006  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch3vr0n View Post
Now how about you post the encoding log of the build that fails, so @jdobbs actually has something to work with and maybe fix?
Yeah. Especially since "error reading disc" isn't an error from within BD-RB.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2019, 10:24   #29007  |  Link
Michi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 62
Muxing Error on RED 2:

Code:
[11.24.19] BD Rebuilder v0.60.29
[09:54:01] Source:  RED_2
  - Input BD size: 59,23 GB
  - Approximate total content: [03:02:05.879]
  - Target BD size: 46,26 GB
  - Windows Version: 6.2 [9200]
  - Quality: Good (Fastest, BD-25+), ABR
  - Decoding/Frame serving: FFMPEG
  - Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=448
[09:54:03] PHASE ONE, Encoding
 - [09:54:03] Processing: VID_00000 (1 of 8)
 - [09:54:03] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00000]
 - [09:58:45] Reencoding video [VID_00000]
 - [09:58:45] Keeping original video (no reencode)
 - [09:58:45] Processing audio tracks
   - Track 4352 (deu): Keeping original audio
 - [09:58:45] Multiplexing M2TS
 - [10:07:08] Processing: VID_00001 (2 of 8)
 - [10:07:08] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00001]
   - Extracting video streams [VID_00001]
   - Extracting audio/subtitle streams [VID_00001]
 - Network Optix tsMuxeR.  Version 2.6.12. www.networkoptix.com
   - Extracting audio streams [VID_00001]
 - Error in attempt to extract audio.
 - Network Optix tsMuxeR.  Version 2.6.12. www.networkoptix.com
 - Network Optix tsMuxeR.  Version 2.6.12. www.networkoptix.com
[10:09:20] - Failed to retrieve audio, aborted
Michi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2019, 10:40   #29008  |  Link
ggtop
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 311
SourceCheck() 0006 2503

Hi,

when opening the source path to a mounted ISO I get an error message "Error Condition" "BD Rebuilder experienced an error 2503 [timestamp] SourceCheck() 0006 2503".
It's a Multi Part BluRay interesstingly it only happens in Movie Only Mode. Switching to Full Backup mode lets BDRB show the stream overview as expected.

As a workaround I used TSMuxer to create a new structure (ISO) with the desired MPLS and used that which worked so far as I can say.

What kind of "illegal source" is this error indicating?

Glad to help and Thank you in advance,
ggtop

Last edited by ggtop; 25th November 2019 at 21:17.
ggtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2019, 14:06   #29009  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggtop View Post
Hi,

when opening the source path to a mounted ISO I get an error message "Error Condition" "BD Rebuilder experienced an error 2503 [timestamp] SourceCheck() 0006 2503".
It's a Multi Part BluRay interesstingly it only happens in Movie Only Mode. Switching to Full Backup mode lets BDRB show the stream overview as expected.

As a workaround I used TSMuxer to create a new structure (ISO) with the desired MPLS and used that which worked so far as I can say.

What kind of "illegal source" is this error indicating?

Glad to help and Thank you in advance,
ggtop
It wasn't necessarily an illegal source. It looks like BD-RB experienced an overflow error while doing a source check. Can you provide the log? I'm kinda flying blind without it.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2019, 17:37   #29010  |  Link
terrykuntz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 16
CPU question?

Will an 8 core CPU be able to complete a bd rebuild twice as fast as an 4 core CPU? Would it be better to get an 8 core intel processor than an 16 core AMD processor?
terrykuntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2019, 23:39   #29011  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrykuntz View Post
Will an 8 core CPU be able to complete a bd rebuild twice as fast as an 4 core CPU? Would it be better to get an 8 core intel processor than an 16 core AMD processor?
x264 and x265 can utilize more than 8 cores so buying Intel CPU makes zero sense.
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2019, 13:49   #29012  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrykuntz View Post
Will an 8 core CPU be able to complete a bd rebuild twice as fast as an 4 core CPU? Would it be better to get an 8 core intel processor than an 16 core AMD processor?
An 8 core CPU will likely complete faster than a 4 core -- but not twice as fast. That's not how multiprocessing works.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2019, 20:28   #29013  |  Link
SquallMX
Special SeeD
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mexico
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
An 8 core CPU will likely complete faster than a 4 core -- but not twice as fast. That's not how multiprocessing works.
Sometimes the gains are even bigger. Going from an 8 core Ryzen 1700x to a 12 core Ryzen 3900 I got a 2X speed boost with only 50% more cores, something to do with optimizations for AVX instruction sets.
SquallMX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2019, 16:18   #29014  |  Link
gg72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 37
Is there any option to disable the 4-way splitting in DirectShow mode?
gg72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2019, 17:34   #29015  |  Link
Ch3vr0n
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,368
Not "just" for DS mode no. There is a general one, disable multiprocess in bdrebuilder.ini (either comment out the line with # in front of it, or just delete it entirely). That's the only possibility
Ch3vr0n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2019, 18:00   #29016  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by gg72 View Post
Is there any option to disable the 4-way splitting in DirectShow mode?
The default is no splitting. The only way it has 4 way splitting is if you've (at some point) set MULTIPROCESS=4 in your INI file or MULTIPROCESS=1 in your INI file and you have 6 (or more) processors.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net

Last edited by jdobbs; 3rd December 2019 at 18:04.
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2019, 18:14   #29017  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
Thought I'd share an interesting point I discovered. I recently got a UHD television and have been experimenting with playback with different 2160p files. Then I decided to disable 4K upscaling on my Sony UBP-X800 so I could make sure I am really getting UHD.

I was a little shocked to find that many of the reencoded UHD MKV/MP4 files weren't actually playing in UHD -- they were playing in 1080p and were being upscaled. Some experimenting showed that only the files I'd reencoded with BD-RB (ALTERNATE mode), or original BD files, were actually playing in true 2160p. My guess is that the player requires the files to be encoded with settings that are uhd-bd compatible (which BD-RB does via X265) and many downloads are not encoded that way.

Just thought I'd pass that on as food for thought. It may be peculiar to my player, I don't know, but I think there are possibly people out there who think they are getting 2160p output when they are actually only getting 1080p upscaled to 2160p on reencoded MKV/MP4 UHD files.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net

Last edited by jdobbs; 7th December 2019 at 15:25.
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2019, 18:23   #29018  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by SquallMX View Post
Sometimes the gains are even bigger. Going from an 8 core Ryzen 1700x to a 12 core Ryzen 3900 I got a 2X speed boost with only 50% more cores, something to do with optimizations for AVX instruction sets.
That's pretty cool.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2019, 19:53   #29019  |  Link
gg72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 37
Thanks jdobbs & Ch3vr0n ;-)
gg72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2019, 07:37   #29020  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
[...]but I think there are possibly people out there who think they are getting 2160p output when they are actually only getting 1080p upscaled to 2160p on downloaded UHD files.
Are you saying that some 2160p files are being reduced to 1080p by your player before being sent to the display? If so, that player, IMHO, is seriously flawed.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.