Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
28th September 2010, 18:36 | #3964 | Link | ||
The Black Reaper
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 320
|
Quote:
Personally, I would prefer that the StaxRip window doesn't close but is just keep behind the log window. I would like other folks using StaxRip to share their thought regarding this, I feel that this will shorten the time taken for the user to add in another job while StaxRip is encoding. I am not saying it's significant or anything but I am sure this will save some clicks before the user can add another job. Quote:
My thinking is that resizing after it have been hardsubbed would lower the visual quality of the sub. There isn't a significant different in the preview window though. I am not sure if my thinking is the same way as avisynth works but I see that MeGUI and RipBot264 places the hardsub filter at the end of the other video filters as well in the AVS Script. |
||
30th September 2010, 10:13 | #3966 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
When batch encoding, the video and audio are way out of sync. Manual merging of the same temp files comes out just fine. So does an individual encode of the same source file(s). From what I can make out, in batch mode mkvmerge doesn't merge @ 24/1001 fps but probably at the 'original' framerate. I can reproduce this error with multiple NTSC sources, but PAL batch encodes work just fine. UPDATE: comparing the logs, the only difference between the OK individual encode and the failed batch encode is in the mkvmerge section: OK: .... Original display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate : 23.976 fps Standard : NTSC .... FAILED: .... Original display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate : 29.970 fps Original frame rate : 23.976 fps Standard : NTSC .... Last edited by MikeTR; 30th September 2010 at 13:06. Reason: update |
|
1st October 2010, 11:17 | #3968 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
|
Didn't change any Batch settings as far as I know. Where to check to be sure?
Logfile for both shows same demux info: ------------------------------------------------------------ DGIndex - Demux audio and index MPEG-2 ------------------------------------------------------------ "C:\ProgramData\StaxRip\Applications\DGMPGDec\DGIndex.exe" -i "C:\Temp\VTS_01_1.VOB" -ia 2 -fo 0 -yr 1 -tn 1 -om 2 -drc 2 -dsd 0 -dsa 0 -o "C:\Temp\VTS_01_1 temp files\VTS_01_1" -hide -exit Demuxer: DGIndex - Demux audio and index MPEG-2 Start: 13:33:01 End: 13:33:09 Duration: 00:00:08 Strange thing is that I've batch encoded NTSC sources before without a problem. Temp files come out fine, so it seems that when merging the wrong framerate is selected somehouw. |
1st October 2010, 15:21 | #3970 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
|
uploaded two log files here (b=batch &i=individually encoded)
http://www.4shared.com/file/hD6LQEWK...taxRip__b.html http://www.4shared.com/file/FuDAyNDW...taxRip__i.html Last edited by MikeTR; 1st October 2010 at 15:24. |
4th October 2010, 02:49 | #3971 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 174
|
I'm just wondering if the preview takes the change when the denoisers are enabled since I save a frame as bmp with and without the heavy denoiser applied and the pictures looks identical, with the rest of the filters (ie. deinterlacers, resizers) I see clearly the difference in preview but not with the denoisers. I'm using Staxrip 1.1.7.0 in Win7.
Last edited by Ryo94; 5th October 2010 at 03:34. |
8th October 2010, 05:07 | #3973 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 860
|
I was wanting to use StaxRip, but it insists on using Java even if I go through and deselect/remove everything except for DGIndex...let me find that old post with the same issue...
Quote:
First post ---> stax76's place, click StaxRip ---> click Download at SourceForge ---> takes you to http://staxmedia.sourceforge.net/ ---> takes you to SourceForge project download page ---> Click to download Last edited by JarrettH; 8th October 2010 at 05:17. |
|
9th October 2010, 20:42 | #3974 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
|
Well, even when i'm not in batch, video and audio is becoming out of sync. I dont know why.
EDIT: Video is out of sync. I tried muxing encoded video with original audio and it did not work. EDIT 2: Using FFVideoSource makes the Video out of sync. Encoding the same file with DirectShowSource works fine, however, the provided version of BeSweet only outputs the first 2 seconds of the audio stream. Replacing it with a version from the author's site fixes the problem. Unfortunately, DirectShowSource does not work for all inputs. I am using Staxrip 1.1.7. My OS is Windows 7 x64. Last edited by Fidelix; 14th October 2010 at 02:26. |
10th October 2010, 20:34 | #3975 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
|
Dunno if I am posting in the right place, but if I am not, please send me in the right direction.
I am running Staxrip 1.1.7.0 beta and I have the same problem in 1.1.6.9. The problem arises when encoding large .ts files from a 1080i HDTV source to x264. I have tried with several different files which are about 1h 30m long and same problem every time: Around 71,5 % (or around 100 000 frames) through the 1pass fps drops from about 25fps to somewhere around 2-3fps. At the same time my CPU load decreases from about 50% to about 5% and there is basically no load on any of the CPU cores. Same thing happens during 2pass only CPU load is initially higher. It's been a while since I encoded large files and seem to remember that I didn't have the problem on version 1.1.6. Also, I don't have the problem with smaller files like 45 min long video. They are encoded in about 1 h 30 min or so while the 1h 30m long video took 14 hours to encode!! Using same x264 settings of course. I am running windows 7 64bit and i7 CPU with 6 GB RAM. Any help greatly appreciated. Edit: Had ver. 1.1.6 still, changed back to that and it worked fine. Last edited by albas; 11th October 2010 at 00:40. |
18th October 2010, 17:55 | #3976 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 82
|
If my input audio is a demuxed AC3 track (PCM I think) from DVD and I select AAC as the audio codec, is this considered transcoding or regular encoding? I heard that transcoding of audio or video reduces the quality even more than an initial encode does. Basically are all AC3 tracks that come from R1 DVDs uncompressed? So encoding them is not considered transcoding?
|
18th October 2010, 19:33 | #3977 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 13
|
StaxRip.ErrorAbortException: x264 failed with exit code -1073741515
Hi!
I'm trying to encode movie with parameter "zones" (x264) and after click start get this error: [quote]StaxRip.ErrorAbortException: x264 failed with exit code -1073741515 Edit: Solved - broken x264.exe Last edited by BlackSand; 19th October 2010 at 11:36. |
20th October 2010, 23:03 | #3978 | Link | |
The Lazy One
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The TurokZone. Next Door are the heavens, hells, and on the backside the void
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
and yes transcoding does reduce quality so please follow the first line i just typed.
__________________
Decided this quote only lol. "Always try to understand the perspective of not only yourself but others as well" Am a fanboy of StaxRip |
|
21st October 2010, 01:19 | #3979 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 297
|
tried to convert some films with Staxrip 1.1.7.0 ASP DivX (8.0 - 8.1.2) all lead to BSOD "IQRL driver not equal" something like that,
anyway went back to DivX 7.2.2 (not sure why but Stax causes BSOD when working with all versions of DivX 8 ASP mode) could be a many reasons what's causing it, could be divx problem, could be a problem with my system.... who can say, but DivX 7.2.2 (which is Codec 6.9.1 works fine) i tried version 8 because i wanted the 6.9.1 update too 6.9.2 but downgraded again because of the BSOD problems. the annoying thing is that the 6.9.1 divx codec keeps wanting to update to 6.9.2 (something about HD), only it doesn't download a small update, but rather downloads version 8 bundle, a message about an update from 6.9.1 too 6.9.2 seems simple enough, but then to have an entire upgrade package downloaded attempting to upgrade 7 to 8 is very....... "i don't have the word for it"....... but doesn't seem right that's for sure. anyway i contemplated weather to post this or not..... i finally thought it would be best too share my experience, just in case there is an issue with Stax and version 8 of DivX ASP. question.... if my codec is 6.9.1 (DivX 7.2.2 bundle) why does the 1st pass and 2nd pass options in staxrip bring up a divx config page that show's 6.8 at the top and not 6.9 as it should? is this a DivX issue or Stax issue? because it appears that i have divx 6.8 installed going by that config page (which is quite worrisome)? Last edited by Pulp Catalyst; 21st October 2010 at 01:31. Reason: tidy up |
21st October 2010, 02:34 | #3980 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Simply encoding to x264 with no audio and then muxing the demuxed AC3 track sounds more straightforward. |
|
Tags |
gui, h.264, h.265, hevc, mkv, x264, x265 |
|
|