Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
21st November 2008, 15:20 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 639
|
24p -> 24000/1001?
How? Is there some secret method, or is it just assumefps(24000,1001)?
Which brings me to the question... why do they still master at 24 fps or 30 fps? It seems rather stupid when the final FPS will always be 24000/1001 or 30000/1001. |
23rd November 2008, 03:26 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 157
|
Are you sure you really really have actual 24p? Because 23.976 is often called 24p, though technically it is not.
24p is the frame rate for film (real film), which typically has matching audio at 48048Hz. This is because American TV shows film at 23.976, slightly slower like 29.97, so the audio can be played back at 48000Hz to match. Note that with AssumeFPS it doesn't adjust the audio, so you'd either want to AssumeSampleRate(48000) if you have 48048Hz audio, or otherwise SSRC(48000) to sync up the audio. If you really want to do that.
__________________
f=33 |
24th November 2008, 03:17 | #6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 157
|
Unless you are filming with a real film camera (i.e. in the +$80,000 range), there's almost no way/reason you would have true 24p and even need to think about 48048Hz. If you have a TV source and you inverse telecine, or a "24p" camera, 24000/1001 is the rate you should use (and get). No need to convert from 23.976 to true 24p. The film TV rate in the US is 24000/1001. And yes, they do master at that rate (on DVD/Blu Ray). Sorry, I missed your question on mastering on my first read.
Edit: They may master the studio original at 24p/48048Hz (or a higher sample rate with similar proportion). This is probably because the whole system is built on it and it's hard to teach an old dog new tricks. But such a slight slowdown is in no way noticeable to the viewers, so it doesn't really matter. The PAL speedup, however, is noticeable.
__________________
f=33 Last edited by NerdWithNoLife; 24th November 2008 at 03:32. |
24th November 2008, 16:07 | #9 | Link |
Sleepy overworked fellow
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maple syrup's homeland
Posts: 933
|
I don't see why using assumefps is not fine for this issue... Assumefps(24000,1001,true) will change the framerate and sync the audio accordingly, without introducing any jerks.
__________________
AnimeIVTC() - v2.00 -http://boinc.berkeley.edu/- Let all geeks use their incredibly powerful comps for the greater good (no, no, it won't slow your filtering/encoding :p) |
24th November 2008, 23:33 | #10 | Link | |
Avisynth Developer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,167
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|