madVR - high quality video renderer (GPU assisted) - Page 1925

chros · 5th July 2016, 11:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magik Mark

Why is it madvr reports my display refresh rates as 23.970 and my source filter (LAV) reports it as 23.976? Is there a way to correct this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by huhn

a custom resolution can change that. but if you are aiming at 23.976 than you are just wasting your time.

Or if you can't use close enough value then use 24p instead of 23p with madVR. (That's what I'm doing.)

CarlosCaco · 5th July 2016, 14:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by chros

Or if you can't use close enough value then use 24p instead of 23p with madVR. (That's what I'm doing.)

In your optimus system hdmi outputs by intel or nvidia?

Sunset1982 · 5th July 2016, 15:00

did some quick testing with my new amd rx480...

my first observations:

compared to my gtx970 I save about 3-6 ms through different tests with different settings.

rx480 gets a bit noisy when stressed with high settings

cant get 4K, HEVC, 10 Bit, HDR files running. Getting green screen. worked with gtx 970.

render ques are stable at 7-8/8 with copyback. Saw some quick jumps to 4-7/8 and back every 1-2 mins, but no dropped frames or glitches. Tested with crimson 6.2.2

Tomorrow I'll get my hands on a gtx1070. I will post the results of the complete test friday.

kanade · 5th July 2016, 16:12

Hey madshi, I'm not able to send the crash report via error dialog to you as I keep getting this error message:

I also didn't get bug report text file after closing the error dialog.

aufkrawall · 5th July 2016, 18:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

compared to my gtx970 I save about 3-6 ms through different tests with different settings.

Probably GCN's madVR performance is a bit higher than the average of most games (or you have to take very GCN friendly games for comparing)?
I'd say my R9 390 can also cope really well compared to my previous GTX 980 OC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

cant get 4K, HEVC, 10 Bit, HDR files running. Getting green screen. worked with gtx 970.

With DXVA2 (CB) or even with software decoding?
In both cases I'd say: outsh!
Polaris driver totally bugged?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

render ques are stable at 7-8/8 with copyback. Saw some quick jumps to 4-7/8 and back every 1-2 mins, but no dropped frames or glitches. Tested with crimson 6.2.2

Cool, thanks. I'm having those jumps very often with 1080p 60fps with Hawaii. Present queue with GTX 980 was totally stable (if driver didn't bug with clock adjustment for OpenCL...).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

Tomorrow I'll get my hands on a gtx1070. I will post the results of the complete test friday.

Really good that you are testing such stuff. Results for madVR are totally rare in the web.

Sunset1982 · 5th July 2016, 18:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by aufkrawall

With DXVA2 (CB) or even with software decoding?(

Edit: hevc file is working with software decoding, but not working with dxva2 cb. If I choose software decoding I can play HEVC files. But HEVC with 4k and hdr info is too much for my cpu. Can't get it running without stuttering like hell. amds hevc decoder seems to be buggy. don't know if it is a softwarebug in crimson drivers or a hardware bug.

Sunset1982 · 5th July 2016, 23:25

finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are...

MadVRComparison.xlsx

with the rx480 you get a performance gain of 9-57 % compared to the good old gtx 970. Power consumption is a up and down. In some scenarios the rx 480 needs more power, sometimes less.

ispano · 6th July 2016, 00:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are...

MadVRComparison.xlsx

with the rx480 you get a performance gain of 9-57 % compared to the good old gtx 970. Power consumption is a up and down. In some scenarios the rx 480 needs more power, sometimes less.

Thx for the comparison. My RX480 arrives today and am especially happy with the fact it can do modest 4k upscaling with NNEDI3. Running an HTPC build off a GTX 285 at the moment

.

Sunset1982 · 6th July 2016, 07:47

Quote:

Thx for the comparison. My RX480 arrives today and am especially happy with the fact it can do modest 4k upscaling with NNEDI3.

It seems to be a good card for madvr. Especially for that price. But I would wait for a custom design, because of the fan, which is a bit noisy under heavy load.

I'm excited about the gtx1070. Will see how it performs today and if it worth the money in terms of madvr performance. Would be nice to have a bit of performance reserve for future madvr features and upscaling refinements, which (except for superres) I didn't use in my tests...

chros · 6th July 2016, 11:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosCaco

In your optimus system hdmi outputs by intel or nvidia?

Intel (that's my "problem"

)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are...

MadVRComparison.xlsx

Thanks, but can you publish this/next one in an online form, e.g. on google docs? (It will be reserved for a long time, and I can't open it with Excel 2003

)

huhn · 6th July 2016, 11:43

try openoffice.

and what is this rubbish? not possible, no HDMI 2.0

of cause the 970 has HDMI 2.0...

Mano · 6th July 2016, 11:52

Sorry for the shameless question but what is the latest stable AMD driver version for madvr?

starlight2 · 6th July 2016, 11:52

Hi, I have a JVC HD350 Projector (RS10),i can use mkv to 4k in HDR ?(obviously in a limited way with respect to a panel HDR)

Sunset1982 · 6th July 2016, 12:13

Quote:

and what is this rubbish? not possible, no HDMI 2.0

of cause the 970 has HDMI 2.0...

The MSI GTX 970 can't do UHD @60Fps... only the newer GTX960 and 980 can.

see:
https://de.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX...-specification

HDMI (version 1.4a)
Max Resolution: 4096x2160 @24 Hz

Xello · 6th July 2016, 12:58

Anyone got experience using MadVR with multiple displays attached ? I'm getting presentation glitches in windowed mode (but not FSE mode), they stop happening if i disable the 2nd monitor.

:edit: nevermind, seem to have stopped happening now randomly. hope it stays that way!

huhn · 6th July 2016, 13:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

The MSI GTX 970 can't do UHD @60Fps... only the newer GTX960 and 980 can.

see:
https://de.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX...-specification

HDMI (version 1.4a)
Max Resolution: 4096x2160 @24 Hz

Monitorausgang über 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DL-DVI-I, 1x DL-DVI-D

they don't have HDCP 2.2 but they can send UHD at 60.

btw all nvidia GPU with kepler or newer can send UHD 60 fps 4:2:0.

nevcairiel · 6th July 2016, 14:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by huhn

they don't have HDCP 2.2 but they can send UHD at 60.

btw all nvidia GPU with kepler or newer can send UHD 60 fps 4:2:0.

So he has the card in his system, and you are going to tell him what it can and cannot do?

Some vendors cheaped out on the 970 models and didn't offer full HDMI 2.0

Sarasa · 6th July 2016, 14:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by nevcairiel

So he has the card in his system, and you are going to tell him what it can and cannot do?

Some vendors cheaped out on the 970 models and didn't offer full HDMI 2.0

Yeh, they also (sometime) sell them a little cheaper.
That why I bought a Asus, they are 2.0

Oh and question, anybody else have random BSOD when watching some video since the last windows security update (Vulnerability in Windows graphics component) ?

iSunrise · 6th July 2016, 14:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunset1982

It seems to be a good card for madvr. Especially for that price. But I would wait for a custom design, because of the fan, which is a bit noisy under heavy load.

I'm excited about the gtx1070. Will see how it performs today and if it worth the money in terms of madvr performance. Would be nice to have a bit of performance reserve for future madvr features and upscaling refinements, which (except for superres) I didn't use in my tests...

Great comparison!

I am really looking forward to your results for the GTX1070, because it seems this card really is a great and powerful madVR card, which is also very well suited for gaming (just the like 970 was and then some, but more expensive unfortunately).

The icing on the cake would be results for the upcoming GTX1060, which should be out tomorrow as I am hearing.

Keep them coming!

huhn · 6th July 2016, 14:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by nevcairiel

So he has the card in his system, and you are going to tell him what it can and cannot do?

Some vendors cheaped out on the 970 models and didn't offer full HDMI 2.0

it doesn't matter it works with an 1.4 hdmi connector.

and it is a typo in the either the us or german specs: https://us.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX...-specification

5th July 2016, 15:00	#38483 \| Link
Sunset1982 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 280	did some quick testing with my new amd rx480... my first observations: compared to my gtx970 I save about 3-6 ms through different tests with different settings. rx480 gets a bit noisy when stressed with high settings cant get 4K, HEVC, 10 Bit, HDR files running. Getting green screen. worked with gtx 970. render ques are stable at 7-8/8 with copyback. Saw some quick jumps to 4-7/8 and back every 1-2 mins, but no dropped frames or glitches. Tested with crimson 6.2.2 Tomorrow I'll get my hands on a gtx1070. I will post the results of the complete test friday. __________________ Intel i5 6600, 16 GB DDR4, AMD Vega RX56 8 GB, Windows 10 x64, Kodi DS Player 17.6, MadVR (x64), LAV Filters (x64), XySubfilter .746 (x64) LG 4K OLED (65C8D), Denon X-4200 AVR, Dali Zensor 5.1 Set

5th July 2016, 23:25	#38487 \| Link
Sunset1982 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 280	amd rx480 vs good old 970 gtx finished my comparison between the gtx970 and amd's rx480. tomorrow i will complete the comparison with the gtx 1070. For those who are interested in AMD's RX480, there you are... MadVRComparison.xlsx with the rx480 you get a performance gain of 9-57 % compared to the good old gtx 970. Power consumption is a up and down. In some scenarios the rx 480 needs more power, sometimes less. __________________ Intel i5 6600, 16 GB DDR4, AMD Vega RX56 8 GB, Windows 10 x64, Kodi DS Player 17.6, MadVR (x64), LAV Filters (x64), XySubfilter .746 (x64) LG 4K OLED (65C8D), Denon X-4200 AVR, Dali Zensor 5.1 Set Last edited by Sunset1982; 5th July 2016 at 23:33.

6th July 2016, 12:58	#38495 \| Link
Xello Registered User Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 42	Anyone got experience using MadVR with multiple displays attached ? I'm getting presentation glitches in windowed mode (but not FSE mode), they stop happening if i disable the 2nd monitor. :edit: nevermind, seem to have stopped happening now randomly. hope it stays that way! Last edited by Xello; 6th July 2016 at 13:14.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

5th July 2016, 16:12	#38484 \| Link
kanade Registered User Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 3	Hey madshi, I'm not able to send the crash report via error dialog to you as I keep getting this error message: I also didn't get bug report text file after closing the error dialog.

6th July 2016, 11:43	#38491 \| Link
huhn Registered User Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 7,923	try openoffice. and what is this rubbish? not possible, no HDMI 2.0 of cause the 970 has HDMI 2.0...

6th July 2016, 11:52	#38492 \| Link
Mano Registered User Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 54	Sorry for the shameless question but what is the latest stable AMD driver version for madvr?

6th July 2016, 11:52	#38493 \| Link
starlight2 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 26	Hi, I have a JVC HD350 Projector (RS10),i can use mkv to 4k in HDR ?(obviously in a limited way with respect to a panel HDR)