Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
19th May 2011, 22:07 | #3281 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,347
|
I also haven't seen those on a live BD, all secondary audio tracks i found are DTS Express.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
19th May 2011, 22:13 | #3282 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
The OTT services like Netflix and Vudu are using DD+ for their streams in some cases, so maybe it will start gaining traction for physical media ? I thought you mentioned that one of the advantages of LAV Audio over ffdshow is the fact that LAV Audio actually bitstreams EAC3 Btw, IIRC, that demo file bitstreamed perfectly with 0.25 and started giving issues only in 0.26 . |
|
19th May 2011, 22:25 | #3284 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
I wish that stupid BD demo disc would never have seen the light of day. Do you really want nevcairiel to spend hours of his time supporting a format which has only ever been used on exactly 1 demo BD disc world wide? There's not a single movie studio which has *ever* used this format.
IMHO every user who posts a sample from that BD demo disc should be banned for a week. Just kidding, of course... I doubt they're going to use the stupid Blu-Ray 7.1 E-AC3 logic, though. They're most probably using the HD DVD 5.1 + 7.1 E-AC3 logic which is supported by LAV Splitter / Audio Decoder just fine. |
19th May 2011, 22:35 | #3285 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
|
Ahh about the encoding issue the same happens @ fastforward in MPC-HC @ 2x i get only 30 fps max not 50 fps as you would expect from that 25fps .ts (Mainconcept Decoder) so something is locking cyberlink demuxer and lav splitter up to 30 fps seems to only happen with them.
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :) It is about Time Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late ! http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004 Last edited by CruNcher; 19th May 2011 at 23:01. |
19th May 2011, 22:41 | #3286 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,351
|
There is NO WAY that broadcasts and other streaming services are going to use BD's implementation. Seriously, I agree here....not useful to spend time on this. If anything, I'd prefer to see the effort spent on getting the Dolby decoder dll's from ArcSoft working if you're going to even bother.
__________________
HTPC: Windows 11, AMD 5900X, RTX 3080, Pioneer Elite VSX-LX303, LG G2 77" OLED |
19th May 2011, 22:57 | #3288 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,351
|
Not that I've ever seen. And broadcasts are never going to use it, either. They'll stick to 5.1. At least for the forseeable future.
__________________
HTPC: Windows 11, AMD 5900X, RTX 3080, Pioneer Elite VSX-LX303, LG G2 77" OLED |
19th May 2011, 23:19 | #3289 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
19th May 2011, 23:34 | #3290 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
|
No go it always locks to 30 fps no difference what you set, it seems like a hard coded parser force, it happens also with other decoder so it seems to be a lav splitter issue it's interesting that Cyberlinks Demuxer has the same problem, many others don't have this issue so it seems avoidable, it also makes fast forward 2x in MPC-HC impossible
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :) It is about Time Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late ! http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004 Last edited by CruNcher; 20th May 2011 at 00:19. |
20th May 2011, 01:41 | #3291 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,351
|
Understood, but, the real world issue is that Nev's time is limited and if he's screwing around with something that we'll never encounter outside of a demo disc, it takes away from real functionality that we can really use. So yes, it's a nice edge case and as a software engineer myself I appreciate those things, it's just not something that's worth giving time to. I'm sure Nev will feel the same way.
__________________
HTPC: Windows 11, AMD 5900X, RTX 3080, Pioneer Elite VSX-LX303, LG G2 77" OLED |
20th May 2011, 05:48 | #3293 | Link | |
3 eyed CRT supporter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Or-strayl-ya
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
Pankov has done some testing for me, and he figured out that ZP is using the Filter Profile for E-AC3 instead of the Filter Profile for FLAC (for FLAC audio). I had LAV Audio chosen in the E-AC3 Profile - which is why it appeared to be forced to me. It sounds like a Zoom Player issue. But it only happens with the LAV Splitter - it's a bit murky. Here's what Pankov said to me: "I've just tried the file and I do think that there is something wrong in ZoomPlayer. Even though the media subtype is one that's specified in the FLAC profile it insists on loading the filter configured in the E-AC3 profile (added in v8.00 RC2 on my request) which has a totally different media subtype ({AFBC2343-3DCB-4047-9655-E1E62A61B1C5}). If you press "I" while playing the file you'll see the Media Information window and there at the bottom ZP states that it's E-AC3 !?!?" So either is a ZP issue, and I apologise, or something about LAV Splitter is sending the wrong media type to ZP or something like that...(I've also posted this in the testing section on the inmatrix forum). Anyway I'm glad Pankov was able to duplicate my issue, therefore I'm not insane (well, maybe a little...) Sorry to give you and madshi the run-around. Mark |
|
20th May 2011, 06:49 | #3294 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,347
|
LAV Splitter does not support adjusting the playback rate. 1x, or get out!
Quote:
Note that E-AC3 will not work with the MPC-HC splitter, as it claims that its AC-3. I can run some quick tests on that.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders Last edited by nevcairiel; 20th May 2011 at 06:56. |
|
20th May 2011, 10:01 | #3295 | Link | |
MPC-HC Project Manager
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,317
|
Quote:
Other than that, i agree.
__________________
MPC-HC, an open source project everyone can improve. Want to help? Test Nightly Builds, submit patches or bugs and chat on IRC |
|
20th May 2011, 10:10 | #3296 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,347
|
Except, there really are no Blu-rays with their main audio in E-AC3 - with the one exception of the Dolby Demo Blu-ray, where they had to show-off their features - and i don't think there are free tools available to create such streams, unlike H264, which has x264 with which you can encode to any level.
Its also not like this is a strict limitation in some hardware chip or something, if there ever surface those discs, for whatever reason, i can still try to fix it. To NVIDIA.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders Last edited by nevcairiel; 20th May 2011 at 10:20. |
20th May 2011, 10:12 | #3297 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
The difference is that high spec h264 files were already widely used when ATI made that decision. Furthermore using higher spec h264 encoding can actually be useful sometimes. Both facts don't apply to Blu-Ray style E-AC3 tracks. They're junk, not useful, have never been used in real life yet and most likely never will be.
|
20th May 2011, 10:24 | #3298 | Link |
MPC-HC Project Manager
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,317
|
I think thats a good benchmark.
Give us a commercial or homebrew sample and work on it can be started. Imho EAC3 is a bad idea anyway.
__________________
MPC-HC, an open source project everyone can improve. Want to help? Test Nightly Builds, submit patches or bugs and chat on IRC |
20th May 2011, 10:28 | #3299 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,347
|
EAC3 itself is fine, it basically just extends AC3 from 5.1 to 7.1 and allows higher bitrates, no magic involved. Its similar enough to AC3 for decoders to adapt quickly, better then inventing a new format. Its basically the Dolby variant to the DTS-ES extensions or certain DTS-HD HRA profiles.
What they did to Blu-ray style E-AC3 tracks is another matter. To keep the tracks backwards compatible to AC3 decoders, they invented this stupid way of only using this 4 channel E-AC3 to replace the AC3 side channels, and add back channels.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders Last edited by nevcairiel; 20th May 2011 at 10:32. |
20th May 2011, 10:58 | #3300 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 661
|
Quote:
the problem turned out to be not in ZoomPlayer itself but in the E-AC3 profile that I've created and spread around. I've used the incorrect media subtype (the one stated above) instead of the real MEDIASUBTYPE_DOLBY_DDPLUS. After fixing it everything is working OK. Nonetheless, it's strange why it happens only with LAV Splitter. At the Inmatrix forum Gleb Egorych noticed that LAV Splitter initially sends MEDIASUBTYPE_FFMPEG_AUDIO ({AFBC2343-3DCB-4047-9655-E1E62A61B1C5}) and then switches to the correct one. Is this intentional? If there are other affected ZoomPlayer users here is the discussion and the correct E-AC3 profile http://forum.inmatrix.com/index.php?showtopic=13088
__________________
Z370M Pro4 | i3-8100 | 16GB RAM | 256GB SSD + 40TB NAS NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB (385.28) | LG OLED65B7V Win 10 64bit 1803 + Zoom Player v14 |
|
Tags |
decoders, directshow, filters, splitter |
|
|