Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
4th January 2015, 12:27 | #61 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Definitively you need to update driver. Latest for HD 4000 is 15.33.30.3958 (10/24/2014).
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Sea...ng&ProdId=3712 You can also try to find one updated on ASUS website. Have support for dual NVIDIA/INTEL GPU. |
5th January 2015, 13:25 | #62 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 17
|
Hi,
I tried to upgrade Windows 7 partition with latest intel driver 15.33.30.64.3958, but it didn't work ("Your system has not the minimal configuration required for this product"). So I used driver given by ASUS support (from 2012, see attach file). I was on 8.15.10.2669 and upgraded to 8.15.10.2778. Upgrade was achieved, but now, BDToAVCHD fails just after first step, when beginnig MVC encoding (whereas with previous version, encoding was performed but still led to pixelation). Last edited by sergio2; 5th January 2015 at 13:30. |
5th January 2015, 14:44 | #63 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Umm
- ASUS driver is too old (2012). - Latest generic Intel driver is not supported by your system. - Previously installed 10.38.10.3308 driver is buggy (pixelation). Solutions: - Use only SW mode. - Change your system. - Try to find other compatible driver.... laptopvideo2go.com is good site. e.g.: http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/top...26#entry147195 http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/top...26#entry147129 |
6th January 2015, 21:32 | #64 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
Another thing to consider: There is an important difference between Windows 7 and Windows 8 for dual GPU configurations (Intel HD Graphics + NVIDIA). In Windows 8 can use the integrated GPU (Intel) even when no monitor is connected (Intel GPU is not active). In Windows 7 it is necessary that the Intel GPU has a connected monitor or use a trick "fake display" method. Because now you're using Windows 7 and Windows 8 before it is possible that for this reason now do not work at all (besides of different driver). This issue had already been discussed in this thread: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...14#post1674714 and also on BDtoAVCHD thread I remember. |
|
13th January 2015, 21:36 | #65 | Link |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 811
|
Update latest Intel graphics driver manually
@sergio2
It is possible to install the latest Intel drivers. Download the driver as .ZIP archive from Intel and extract the content. Then start the device manager. Search for the Intel HD 4000 graphics and make a driver update from disk folder manually. Tested on Win 7 and 8.1 with Ivy chipset and HD 4000 on ASUS Zenbook. Intel's EXE driver installer lately includes a test that prevents updates of OEM driver releases. And OEM's don't care about their old hardware. Last edited by frank; 13th January 2015 at 21:48. |
16th January 2015, 11:39 | #66 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
In addition there are new Intel driver available: 15.33.32.4061 (1/8/2015) => https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Sea...ng&ProdId=3712 |
|
24th January 2015, 09:40 | #67 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 17
|
When I upgrade manually with last Intel driver (it works, I check it in device manager), my ASUS notebook behaves in two ways :
1- when I reboot computer after upgrade, I get a bloody black screen and I have to reboot in safe boot to return to previous driver ! 2- If I don't reboot after upgrade, previous driver is reinstalled without doing anything ! My ASUS K95VM is a really crap ! |
23rd March 2015, 03:54 | #68 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1
|
Forgive me if I missed it somewhere, but is there a more complete tutorial/explanation on how to use this tool?
I would like to convert a video using this tool so I can compare the results to others like HandBrake, MeGUI (which I currently use), etc. For instance, I normally use CineForm as an intermediate codec for my regular editing work. Would I be able to use this tool to transcode from CineForm to x264? I can't seem to find the codecs this tool will accept as input other than h264. Advice? |
23rd March 2015, 10:11 | #69 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
This is a tool for very specific task: transcode Blu-Ray 3D to BD-9/BD-25 MVC 3D. Only accepts codec h.264 because is the only codec used by Blu-Ray 3D. This is not a general purpose encode tool like MeGUI and can not transcode to x264... (only x264 can transcode to x264 ) |
|
26th March 2015, 09:50 | #71 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 851
|
Hi,
I have an error with MVCEnc. I use it with BDtoAVCHD. Quote:
Quote:
Edit 2 : Quality 3 = Slow Last edited by Nico8583; 26th March 2015 at 11:28. |
||
27th March 2015, 22:56 | #73 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 851
|
It doesn't matter to me, I give up the MVC encoder Intel because the quality is too bad compared to x264. This is not specific to MVCEnc, I have the same quality problem with FRIMEncoder, even choosing BD-25 output.
|
29th March 2015, 16:57 | #74 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
I'm investigated this and seems only occur on slow systems, when encoding speed is punctually < 1 fps. For this reason only occurs on SW encoding and quality 1 or 2. I simulated running in parallel CPU stress test software to slow down the system until encoding speed is < 1 fps. Seems a kind of race condition due timeout and bad implementation. This new build should fix: MVCenc.exe (Copy MVCenc.exe to BDtoAVCHD install folder) I will appreciate some feedback since I have not been fully tested. Also I do not have any so slow PC that causes the fault spontaneously. |
|
29th March 2015, 19:40 | #75 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 851
|
Ok thanks I'll try later just to be sure because I'll not use Intel MVC encoder (MVCenc or FRIMenc) anymore. Just for information the system I have used to test is a 2 x Xeon E5506 but without HW encoding... I was thinking it will be more faster than 2,5 fps with quality 3
|
19th April 2015, 21:53 | #78 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 17
|
Hi,
I finally managed to upgrade Intel HD graphic on my ASUS with last driver 10-18-10-4176 from 30/03/2015. I had to upgrade manually (with .inf file), and strangely (fortunatly), this driver seems to be stable ! With this new driver, I reencoded a full Blu-Ray in a 25 GB Blu-Ray with BDToAVCHD version 2-2-4 with media SDK acceleration (HW) : still this bloody irreversible pixelation after jumping fast forward .m2ts file on my Samsung TV ! Then I upgraded BDToAVCHD to last version 2-4-1 and did the same job again : no pixelation anymore ! Incredible ! (thanks to media SDK 2015 upgrade I suppose ?) Edit : I tried several encoding from placebo (TU = 1) to medium (TU = 4) quality. The thing is I did'nt notice any differences in time encoding switching from 35 to 40 fps in all cases. Is this normal ? Last edited by sergio2; 20th April 2015 at 11:57. |
20th April 2015, 18:40 | #79 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
Yes is normal. Fps on HW are limited by hardware/drivers. Presets or "Target Usage" has more influence for SW encode. Also in high end CPUs/GPUs is more noticeable (is not your case for "old" laptop). |
|
Tags |
3d blu-ray encoder, mvc encoder, mvcenc |
|
|