Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
2nd July 2015, 02:17 | #31481 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
|
Quote:
The desire behind this request is for someone to test madVR with a wide collection of video cards in a systematic way and post the results. A special tool isn't required for that and it wouldn't even make the process much easier. This is to use madVR like 3DMark, simply as a way to compare the performance of two video cards, not to pick settings.
__________________
madVR options explained |
|
2nd July 2015, 02:58 | #31482 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 177
|
It's not practical to do it manually. It would take time to create all the profiles, run them one by one, record them, then write it in the spreadsheet. Plus you need the same source material. Countless of other factors can result in errors and is overall too much of a hassle. No one would participate. You need to automate the process with a script. Press one button and it runs the bench and uploads the results to the spreadsheet.
|
2nd July 2015, 04:13 | #31483 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 919
|
Quote:
Quote:
You can always create a "madVR GPU Benchmark Thread" in which you'll define certain parameters with a certain madVR version as a base. People could post their results with the GPU's they own there, and not contaminate madVR official thread with such nonsense. As I already said. Just keep the rendering time under frame time. 1/"frame time" = maximum rendering time before dropped frames. Cheers.
__________________
System: i7 3770K, GTX660, Win7 64bit, Panasonic ST60, Dell U2410. Last edited by James Freeman; 2nd July 2015 at 04:27. |
||
2nd July 2015, 04:55 | #31485 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
Quote:
Benchmark results show the most demanding setting you can run real time. |
||
2nd July 2015, 11:11 | #31489 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
the latest Calman release now has some improvements when running Calman on the same PC as madTPG. The changes have been inspired by your "complaint"... So it would be awesome if you could try the new build and maybe provide feedback here: http://www.spectracal.com/forum/view...hp?f=94&t=5729 Stacey Spears has actively asked for feedback about this. Would be great if you could tell him/us if it works better now, or if there's still something that could be improved. |
|
2nd July 2015, 13:28 | #31492 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd July 2015, 13:33 | #31493 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,646
|
Haha. You need to look closer.. or chop the picture up and compare in an image viewer, this is why I asked for individual images, placing them together like that doesn't make comparing them very easy.
BTW feel free to edit quotes BTW, you didn't need to quote his entire post. |
2nd July 2015, 18:53 | #31494 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 77
|
Better to use something like http://screenshotcomparison.com/
|
2nd July 2015, 18:57 | #31495 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
I will post my feedback on SuperRes by the weekend. |
||
2nd July 2015, 19:48 | #31496 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/133465 ikarad, look at the right edge of the pink band for a difference. It's something. |
|
3rd July 2015, 01:57 | #31497 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 131
|
opencl error
Anyone knows how to solve this:
"error: input is not a PCH file: 'cl_kernel.h.pch' fatal error: 'cl_kernel.h.pch' does not appear to be a precompiled header file" ?? I get it when trying to use s-xbr on XP SP3 and Nvidia 352.86 |
3rd July 2015, 15:45 | #31499 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
|
lockups
I'm getting lockups after updating to the latest version of madvr. it was either madvr or strongene hevc decoder i recently installed. disabled strongene and lockups still occur. playing hevc with lav, ffdshow raw, & svp on intel gpu.
|
3rd July 2015, 18:55 | #31500 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 851
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|