Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 13
|
What filters to use for grain preservation
I'm encoding full Blurays to about 3000kbps with x264 as encoder, if the result is not as I wish I slightly increase the bitrate till it does. I'm encoding a variety of sources so some are very grainy and others are not.
I currently use Limitedsharpenfaster() for the sharpening but what other filters could I test for a good compression and grain preservation? Thank you |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Thailand
Posts: 259
|
3000kpbs at 1080p or do you resize down?
Frankly 3000 is a bit on the low side even for 720p and since you're also using LSF, it'll probably look even worse with such low bitrates. On top of this, you want to preserve grains at this low bitrate as well? With such low bitrate, you're better off to REMOVE the grains. Since bitrate is obviously not your main concern, you should just use CRF setting instead of 2-pass bitrate setting. This way you won't need to increase your bitrate if the result is not good enough for you. Try for example maybe CRF=24 to get around 3000kbps for 720p encodes. This depends on the source, movies with much dark scenes, the bitrate will be much lower at a given CRF. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
As you said yourself, 3000kbps can sometimes give a transparent encode and sometimes it cannot. Therefore I try to get the best result with a low bitrate and so my question what filters to use still stands. Thank you for your reply! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Thailand
Posts: 259
|
But I'm telling you, you're not gonna get a good encode with only 3000 bitrate for 720, regardless.
I never said 3000 will ever give "transparent" encode at 720p. CRF mode is the better method to be sure that you will get constant quality from your encodes regardless of source. I'm also telling you that you will get better quality by not having grains at this low bitrate. If you keep the grains, the x264 will encode at a worse quality because of the limited low bitrate. According to the x264 docs, CRF=20 should get an overall good quality, but I doubt any type of source you will get 3000 bitrate with CRF=20 1280x720. It'll be more like at least 4000+. The more grainy and sharp source, the higher bitrate the CRF will use also. But obviously every of us has different perception of "quality". I can tell you this that for 1280x720 @ 3000 bitrate, most people aren't gonna consider this a quality encode. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 13
|
@feisty2 of course you'll always notice the quality is not the same as on the BD, however it is simply a trade-off between quality and file size and I am therefore trying to get a good quality/filesize ratio. This trade-off is naturally different per person.
@Reel.Deel thanks a lot! Exactly these type of filters I am looking for ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
![]() My m720p encodes @ 3K are definitely not considered "not quality". Of course, transparency is another issue entirely. It's hardly possible to keep 1:1 ratio with 35K Bitrate grainy movie compressed into 3K encode. Possibilities in Avisynth, however, are quite endless to overcome this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
avisynth, compression, filters, grain, x264 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|