Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
3rd October 2020, 01:00 | #1881 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Quote:
|
|
1st December 2020, 03:40 | #1883 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Within the main Source.
Posts: 895
|
Hello. Are you willing to add a hidden option to enable MULTIPROCESS again? For now I'm using 0.61.13 only for processing MKVs made by BD-RB to rerender some of my collection to small files again to MKV. My current Ryzen 3600 is faster than my GeForce GTX 780 using the nVIDIA rerender you added. The MULTIPROCESS is still viable.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave; but rather to skid out broadside, thoroughly used, torn and warn and loudly proclaim; WOW; What a ride!!! Soon, I'm going to do it AGAiN in different skin!! |
2nd December 2020, 15:10 | #1884 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Quote:
Last edited by jdobbs; 2nd December 2020 at 15:16. |
|
2nd December 2020, 17:45 | #1885 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
|
When using the FORCE_ENCODE=1 hidden option, the "You have selected x output for a source with a fairly significant content." prompt appears. If I am correct in believing it to be superfluous, perhaps it could be skipped/removed?
__________________
Win 10 Pro x64 |
5th December 2020, 04:36 | #1886 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Within the main Source.
Posts: 895
|
Quote:
Outside of BD, if someone wants MP...then much newer hardware is going to be required which is why you typed before that MULIPROCESS is becoming obsolete. Correct? I'm curious.. If UHD Is Not the reason for MULTIPROCESS to become obsolete...what is? I can see UHD using the advantage of MP. Disregarding the need for storage. Which will become greater as M.2 NVMe becomes more widely accepted. Maybe I'm missing something..? I went M.2 with my Ryzen but it was several months after. Anyway, Appreciation!!
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave; but rather to skid out broadside, thoroughly used, torn and warn and loudly proclaim; WOW; What a ride!!! Soon, I'm going to do it AGAiN in different skin!! |
|
4th January 2021, 22:59 | #1887 | Link | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Quote:
Quote:
The reason it was disabled (in addition to my belief that it was no longer accomplishing anything) was because BD-RB started using the newer TSMUXER version as the default. There were changes in the file naming convention for multipart sources in the new TSMUXER. |
||
17th April 2022, 21:50 | #1889 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
|
An option to "extract all streams first"? This way, the source would soon not be required - helpful if it's an external device.
Also, it'd separate more clearly the extraction and encoding steps, and reveal possible source issues early in the process.
__________________
Win 10 Pro x64 |
11th September 2022, 11:51 | #1890 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 171
|
Within NVENCC v0.10.7 (is this the latest version ??) it is possible to reencode the video and leave the audio intact. It would be nice to also have the ability to reencode the audio but keep the video intact.
|
1st October 2022, 11:57 | #1896 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 13
|
If you wish to retain intact video just set the output size larger than input. For example on a 50GB Bluray, set the "custom target size" to be 90000 in the setup option. That seems to work for me. That does of course mean all video streams are left untouched. Or is your request for a selectable video to be untouched but the remainder processed?
|
1st October 2022, 17:42 | #1897 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 171
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|