Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > (HD) DVD, Blu-ray & (S)VCD > DVD & BD Rebuilder

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18th April 2010, 00:21   #7761  |  Link
SoniG
Registered User
 
SoniG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PARIS, France
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capsbackup View Post
Just curious, but if I set DEINTERLACE=0 on a full backup to BD5/9, where the main movie is 29.97, 1080i, and is experiencing this jerky playback, but the extras have some 29.97, 1080i and some 23.976, 1080P, how will the 1080P files be treated?
They will be treated and outputed as progressive, no worry. Most of issues come from 480 footages (and VC-1 format I would say). But here you say you have jerky playback on a 1080i footage (in motions I suppose) with no option (or DEINTERLACE=1), is that right?
SoniG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 00:33   #7762  |  Link
Capsbackup
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoniG View Post
They will be treated and outputed as progressive, no worry. Most of issues come from 480 footages (and VC-1 format I would say). But here you say you have jerky playback on a 1080i footage (in motions I suppose) with no option (or DEINTERLACE=1), is that right?
Default was set, and playback was jerky on camera panning scenes. ( I guess default DEINTERLACE=1 )
I made a movie only backup of this 1080i, 29.97fps, avc video that experiences these issues.
Since the entire original BD-25 disc has only 1:59:38 of video, I was considering a full backup test to BD5 to burn to DVD+RW with DEINTERLACE=0. Just trying to see if this corrects the problem on the main movie, and if the extras will be ok, I may redo to a BD9 for higher quality.
Capsbackup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 00:39   #7763  |  Link
f362580
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
I dont't know if it is a bug or just expected result of x264 ABR setting but I get constant 1-1.5Gb undersize when doing BD-25 movie only encode.

Also I want to know what settings BD rebuilder uses when doing "Automatic Quality Settings": ABR + good / better / high quality? It seems relatively fast (0.5x on my OC e6300) compared to manually set "high quality (default) + 1pass ABR", is it normal?
f362580 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 00:45   #7764  |  Link
8ternity
Registered User
 
8ternity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: At Home
Posts: 403
@jdobbs:

I have make some tries to try to find what happen.

i have install the bew x264.exe version to know if it's the version of x264 has the trouble, and not.

i have also try to change mkvmerge with the newer version to check out if its that the trouble and not.

i asked you that question previoulsy what happen with my issue because i want to know if you need something precise that i need to change or do, and if you need more log or softwares informations.

Thank You,
__________________
PC; 7.5 on 7.9 (Windows Experience Rating) on the lower rating.
8ternity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 01:14   #7765  |  Link
SoniG
Registered User
 
SoniG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PARIS, France
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capsbackup View Post
Default was set, and playback was jerky on camera panning scenes. ( I guess default DEINTERLACE=1 )
I made a movie only backup of this 1080i, 29.97fps, avc video that experiences these issues.
Since the entire original BD-25 disc has only 1:59:38 of video, I was considering a full backup test to BD5 to burn to DVD+RW with DEINTERLACE=0. Just trying to see if this corrects the problem on the main movie, and if the extras will be ok, I may redo to a BD9 for higher quality.
Oh yeah I forgot that with DEINTERLACE=1 (so with no option), interlaced sources are deinterlaced but encoded and outputed as interlaced, that's why you have jerky playback. I already reported this to jdobbs.
SoniG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 02:56   #7766  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capsbackup View Post
Just curious, but if I set DEINTERLACE=0 on a full backup to BD5/9, where the main movie is 29.97, 1080i, and is experiencing this jerky playback, but the extras have some 29.97, 1080i and some 23.976, 1080P, how will the 1080P files be treated?
DEINTERLACE only applies to interlaced sources.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 02:57   #7767  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by k-c-ksum View Post
has the encoding speed options changed. upgraded to latest version from .33.02. that version had a ultra slow HQ option that dosent appear in the latest version. Speed isnt an issue, i would rather an encode take 36 hours instead of 20 if it can squeeze an ounce more detail into the pic quality. Is this encode preset now hidden?
It has to be something else -- the latest version is actually a bit faster.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 04:05   #7768  |  Link
tandi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
hi, got it working, but got new message while reencoding video

' Audio and/or PGS size too large, probable oversize, continue ?"

what should i do then ?
tandi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 04:54   #7769  |  Link
8ternity
Registered User
 
8ternity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: At Home
Posts: 403
Resolved.
__________________
PC; 7.5 on 7.9 (Windows Experience Rating) on the lower rating.

Last edited by 8ternity; 20th April 2010 at 05:47.
8ternity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 06:10   #7770  |  Link
fabul
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Hi,Thank you for your good work,

I have the same question as k-c-ksum

Quote:
Originally Posted by k-c-ksum View Post
has the encoding speed options changed. upgraded to latest version from .33.02. that version had a ultra slow HQ option that dosent appear in the latest version. Speed isnt an issue, i would rather an encode take 36 hours instead of 20 if it can squeeze an ounce more detail into the pic quality. Is this encode preset now hidden?
I don't understand what you mean by "It has to be something else --"

I also noticed this in v.33.02 "Ultra high quality" and i like this option,it dissapears from the encoder options in some circumstances like when i change the BD custom size after choosing this option and i cannot find this option in v.33.04.

Sorry for my english,

Last edited by fabul; 18th April 2010 at 07:06.
fabul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 07:52   #7771  |  Link
Zot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by fabul View Post
Hi,Thank you for your good work,

I have the same question as k-c-ksum


....I also noticed this in v.33.02 "Ultra high quality" and i like this option,it dissapears from the encoder options in some circumstances like when i change the BD custom size after choosing this option and i cannot find this option in v.33.04.

Sorry for my english,
From what I understand, that option was 'accidently' enabled in 33.02. You can edit the config file and set encode_quality=4 to achieve the same thing. I just did "Mask of Zorro" from BD50 to BD25 at setting of 4 - looks like the original. However, I've taken BD25's to DVD5 at encode_quality=3 (Highest), and still can't tell the difference. So - not sure how much you will actually see for the extra 24 hours of encoding or so. (BTW - I've shown people the original BD and the DVD5 output from BD Rebuilder - hard pressed to see any difference on a 110" screen!)


Zot
Zot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 09:24   #7772  |  Link
k-c-ksum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
It has to be something else -- the latest version is actually a bit faster.
there is no ultra slow option in .33.04 though. Default high quality and very slow, were as .33.02 had default, very slow and extremly slow. Or is the new very slow option in the latest build using a similar profile as the Extremely Slow from .33.02?


also while encoding i left resize and noise activated by mistake as i was watching some SD TV upscaled yesterday. Does BDRB over ride those settings or will the current project also have the resize and noise settings encoded into the video?
__________________
k-c-ksum

Last edited by k-c-ksum; 18th April 2010 at 10:59.
k-c-ksum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 15:25   #7773  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by k-c-ksum View Post
there is no ultra slow option in .33.04 though. Default high quality and very slow, were as .33.02 had default, very slow and extremly slow. Or is the new very slow option in the latest build using a similar profile as the Extremely Slow from .33.02?


also while encoding i left resize and noise activated by mistake as i was watching some SD TV upscaled yesterday. Does BDRB over ride those settings or will the current project also have the resize and noise settings encoded into the video?
Sorry, I misread your post.

My opinion is that there is never an instance when that level of encoding is needed and that's why it doesn't show on the menu. That option has been there for almost a year now -- but because I think it wastes time, it was never meant to be a standard choice that is easily set. But you can still select it by adding the following line to your INI file:

ENCODE_QUALITY=4

"Automatic" has to be turned off before you modify the INI. Note, also, that if you change the quality level from the menu, it will overwrite what you manually set in the INI file.

What's the "noise" setting?
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net

Last edited by jdobbs; 18th April 2010 at 15:31.
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 15:33   #7774  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
@8ternity

That's confusing, because I did "The Blide Side" with FFDSHOW r3326 and had no issues at all. Try reinstalling 3326 and see if it still causes issues. It's possible that all it needed was to be reinstalled for some reason.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 17:23   #7775  |  Link
tandi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
hi jdobbs
i've tried 3 titles

-first title - after all process complete & burn with imgburn, test in bluray player and bluray rom , it worked

-second title - while reencoding video, got this message
' Audio and/or PGS size too large, probable oversize, continue ?"
i press yes to continue , after complete the result was 11 gb ( i was set it to BD-9)

-third title - after all complete , burn it, i test it in bluray player it can't play it, and in bluray rom got this message while try play it with powerDVD ' a disc with unsupported format '

any suggestion for these issue ?
tandi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 18:29   #7776  |  Link
raul124
Registered User
 
raul124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yonkers New York USA
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
It has to be something else -- the latest version is actually a bit faster.
Yes it is a faster version, take a look @Armored (movie only) it only literally took just under 3 hours. The picture quality excellent to the original.[22:16:04] BD Rebuilder v0.33.04 (beta)
- Source: ARMORED
- Input BD size: 20.33 GB
- Approximate total content: [01:27:53.268]
- Target BD size: 7.72 GB
- Windows Version: 6.0 [6002]
- MOVIE-ONLY mode enabled
- One Pass ABR Mode enabled
- Audio Settings: AC3=1 DTS=1 HD=1 Kbs=640
- Subtitle [1] is defaulted ON.
[22:16:04] PHASE ONE, Encoding
- [22:16:04] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00011]
- [22:20:29] Reencoding: VID_00011 (1 of 1)
- [22:20:29] Collecting video information
- Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080
- Rate/Length: 23.976fps, 126,432 frames
- Bitrate: 10,961 Kbs
- [22:20:29] Reencoding: VID_00011, Pass 1 of 1
- [23:58:20] Video Encode complete
- [23:58:20] Reencoding audio tracks (if req'd)
- [00:01:28] Multiplexing M2TS
[00:05:44]PHASE ONE complete
[00:05:44]PHASE TWO - Rebuild Started
- [00:05:44] Rebuilding AVCHD file Structure
[00:10:19] - Encode and Rebuild complete
[00:10:20] BURNING BD structure to disc
- ImgBurn completed successfully
[01:09:49]JOB: ARMORED finished.
raul124 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 18:36   #7777  |  Link
k-c-ksum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
Sorry, I misread your post.

My opinion is that there is never an instance when that level of encoding is needed and that's why it doesn't show on the menu. That option has been there for almost a year now -- but because I think it wastes time, it was never meant to be a standard choice that is easily set. But you can still select it by adding the following line to your INI file:

ENCODE_QUALITY=4

"Automatic" has to be turned off before you modify the INI. Note, also, that if you change the quality level from the menu, it will overwrite what you manually set in the INI file.

What's the "noise" setting?
ffdshows noise filter. I use ffdshow to scale SD TV in realtime for live watching but forgot to switch the filter off when i had finished.


thanks for the encode_quality option. I only use that on stuff that is over two and a half hours or were the source is poor. Whats an extra 12 hours ontop of an encode
__________________
k-c-ksum
k-c-ksum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2010, 19:28   #7778  |  Link
8ternity
Registered User
 
8ternity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: At Home
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdobbs View Post
@8ternity

That's confusing, because I did "The Blide Side" with FFDSHOW r3326 and had no issues at all. Try reinstalling 3326 and see if it still causes issues. It's possible that all it needed was to be reinstalled for some reason.
True. I reinstall the ffdshow 3326 and it has worked.
__________________
PC; 7.5 on 7.9 (Windows Experience Rating) on the lower rating.
8ternity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2010, 00:40   #7779  |  Link
kanerulz69
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 71
jdobbs if im playing on a 65in tv do you think its best using automatic quality settings or uncheck so it does a 2-pass? cause putting in the original blu ray disc and putting in my backup copy (doing automatic quality) it looks a lil different?
ps by the way im doing bd-25 output option
kanerulz69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2010, 00:55   #7780  |  Link
DK
Registered User
 
DK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 426
Even on 25GB media I have more than once come across poor output quality when not using high or even highest quality!
Titles were Fireball (the underwater scenes were real crap with fast options!) or today the BBC documentary "Galapagos", where I tried "automatic quality" and went for high quality 1 pass abr later on as the automatic setting results were too poor even though the input was only~24.80gb down to 22.66gb.

I rather have some more time spent on the encoding than watching for the next blocky scene instead of enjoying HD worthy material.


BTW is there a thread for feature requests?

The following came to my mind:
- in batch mode it is not possible to delete an entry (I wanted to do so but had to stop the current process altogether)
- could more infos of a current conversion added to the corresponding log file like the quality setting used and the last command txt files content or the infos which inspect provides as I sometimes like to take a look which version was used for the encoding of XYZ
- recently I'd wished I was able to have one out of two audiostreams converted down to 448/640 but keep the other as is for a 25gb conversion

Last edited by DK; 19th April 2010 at 01:01.
DK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.