Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
10th July 2015, 20:05 | #31641 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Interframe, dmitrirender and AMD Fluid Motion are great but I would love an integration in madvr. Something of great quality based on madshi experience and user feedback. |
|
10th July 2015, 21:09 | #31642 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 54
|
Sub was late so i downloaded raw. Then i notice in the subbed version there are shudders when camera move while there no such thing in the raw file.
I cut it with [ffmpeg -i shudder.mkv -ss 00:04:20.0 -c copy -t 00:00:08.0 cut.mkv] (not sure if this is the correct command to preserve everything). shudder (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6_...ew?usp=sharing) no shudder (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6_...ew?usp=sharing) So is it my side problem or the encoder? |
10th July 2015, 23:03 | #31643 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Printscreen -> Paste the first image Change madVR settings Printscreen again -> Paste as NEW LAYER over the first one Repeat if necessary. Check if all layers are selected. Crop. Now select each layer separately. "Copy visible" each one and paste as NEW IMAGE. Export each image as PNG. |
|
10th July 2015, 23:09 | #31644 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
I just tried a bit around with AdaptiveSharpen vs. FineSharp as upscaling refinements, and I have to say that I now understand why some people describe FineSharp as pure destruction.
It increases ringing in a very unpleasant way, but you need need a lot of strength to make it actually sharpen things noticeably. With AdaptiveSharpen, you can use much smaller values and it will really sharpen areas which actually need the sharpen. It also doesn't suffer by ringing like FS in LL. Some textures still get brighter, but probably this is how sharpen just works to some degree? |
11th July 2015, 00:17 | #31646 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 255
|
I'm really liking super-xbr at 50 for chroma and image doubling with bilinear upscaling/downscaling. Upscaling DVDs with Jinc AR looks pretty terrible, but Bilinear hides the source artifacts quite well. Sharpness is nice, but not if it makes the videos look worse.
I'm basing this on watching Batman: The Animated Series. Last edited by AngelGraves13; 11th July 2015 at 00:21. |
11th July 2015, 01:12 | #31647 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Thanks, tFWo. Will try it out.
Phew, I'm not really good in judging quality of SuperRes for filmed material. I'm lacking samples for which I'd really know at what I'd have to pay attention to. At least I wouldn't choose algo 2 because of the softness and between 1 and 3, I don't see a real difference with 720p content I've quickly thrown at it. But since 1 tends to make some colors to bright with cartoons, maybe there's no good reason not to use 3? New SuperRes still improves sharpness with the corresponding parameters, I don't agree that the image would look "dirty" with it. It's neat to improve the result with any non-NNEDI3 scaler for filmed material. But I honestly rather use NNEDI3 + AS. |
11th July 2015, 03:20 | #31648 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
I have a run-of-the-mill (KDL40w3000) 8 YO 40" Sony Bravia and it provides selection of either full range or limited RGB under "Video Options">"RGB Dynamic Range" for each of the HDMI inputs. YMMV Last edited by MistahBonzai; 11th July 2015 at 03:38. |
|
11th July 2015, 04:19 | #31649 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 860
|
When image doubling, does chroma upscaling happen before chroma doubling?
In that case, would the chain look like... chroma > super-xbr (chroma upscaling) > super-xbr (chroma doubling) Last edited by JarrettH; 11th July 2015 at 04:47. |
11th July 2015, 10:31 | #31651 | Link | |
Dopax
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Yes............................. I'd also taken into account that information but , unfortunately , don't have that option ; I mean , it doesn't allow me the space color change in the HDMI inputs . What's more, it doesn't indicate what space color are using that HDMI input............... simply says "not available for the current input" Greetings |
|
11th July 2015, 13:02 | #31652 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
|
|
11th July 2015, 13:53 | #31654 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
In my opinion when building an HTPC Performance should come first before quality, since running Full NNEDI3 renders gpu to run at its fullest and depending on the gpu cooler, noise problems. And thankfully S-XBR was created to cater for many HTPC's that don't have powerful gpu's. and It seems NNEDI3 consumes alot of GPU load for less obvious improvement in picture quality over S-XBR which oozes with efficiency and better detail retention. Unless one enjoys looking at static picture just to notice a minute improvement of NNEDI3 then by all means. enjoy staring. |
|
11th July 2015, 15:11 | #31657 | Link |
Kid for Today
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,477
|
After quite a bit of fiddling today, I think there's no free lunch to be expected. Many sources come with ringing to begin with and yeah, if you magnify it it will become more obvious...sxbr digs more than NNEDI3 IMHO and as a result also rings more, I currently run sxbr50 with SR(3 passes, 0.65 sharpness, 0.01 softness) and it's working really well IME in mVR .15, OTOH 0.00 softness looks too edgy to my taste.
|
11th July 2015, 19:21 | #31658 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Sent from my 306SH |
|
11th July 2015, 19:33 | #31659 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
I'll reply to all your posts later. For now I would just like to share a new test build, using a tweaked SuperRes algorithm:
http://madshi.net/madVR8816b.rar SuperRes image quality should generally be slightly better than in the official v0.88.16 build, furthermore I've added an anti-ringing filter which should noticeably reduce ringing artifacts introduced by SuperRes. I hope that the anti-ringing filter will allow us to use algo 2, which is my favorite algorithm, but didn't work well due to the added ringing artifacts in v0.88.16. FWIW, if I had to decide on final SuperRes configuration right now, it would be this: - algo = 2 - use alternative color space = off - low: strength=0.5; passes=1 - medium: strength=1.0; passes=1 - high: strength=1.0; passes=2 - ultra: strength=1.0; passes=4 Would like to have your feedback about this. If you believe that the above settings are a totally bad idea, please let me know. Ideally with a small sample which shows that other settings work much better. Or if you like my settings, please let me know, too. Thanks! |
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
|
|