Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 490
|
HD to DVD
Hi all,
I have been asked which format to use and I need your help. I will be given one of the following: Apple ProRes HD 422HQ 50i or Apple ProRes HD 422HQ 25p. The above file will be used to encode an Mpeg2 PAL file with CCE to use it for creating an SD DVD. Which one should I use? The 50i or the 25p? Thanks!
__________________
" 2 minds are better than 1 " |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 632
|
If the 50i video file carries 50 individual fields which indeed contain individual steps of motion then you definitely should use the 50i file for DVD creation.
If you don't, you would throw away 50% of motion which you otherwise would have been able to put on DVD no problem. So, check the 50i file for interlacing. If there's no interlacing then it's just the flag saying it's interlaced and the video contained within is actually 25p anyway. However, in that case there's pretty much no difference between the two files, so just grab the 50i. However, I hightly suggest not to simply dump the ProRes file on CCE and expect it to make a great MPEG2 for DVD out of that. CCE is a good encoder, no question. But it's an encoder – it's not particularly good at all the other things (most important here: scaling!) that need to be done prior to encoding. Better use AviSynth for that. Last edited by TheSkiller; 15th November 2012 at 18:48. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 490
|
Thank you!
So, in any case, I should use the 50i, right? Why 50i is better than 25p for DVD use? And thanks for the tip for CCE! Maybe I will downscale it to 720x576 from FCP. Quote:
__________________
" 2 minds are better than 1 " |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
1080 23.98 Cross conversion to 24p fps, 50i fps, 25p fps So I guess, they convert the 23.98 to the other formats. Does this say anything to you? Thanks.
__________________
" 2 minds are better than 1 " |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
|
Yes, it says that they'll do a fps conversion, which you should better do it yourself.
The best bet would be to create a NTSC DVD, most if not all PAL equipment is able to play them.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 632
|
Alright, so things aren't as easy as it seemed from your first post.
![]() In that case, like Ghitulescu mentioned, you most likely want to get the original 23.976 fps video file from them. The only reason I can think of why you'd still want them to give you something more PAL compatible would be if they did a proper conversion to 50i (via Pulldown) or 25p (via Speed-Up) so that you don't have to deal with that and have an easy time making a PAL DVD. At this point you have to decide between these two: 1) Simply make a NTSC DVD from the 23.976 video. Easy. But slightly inferior to a proper PAL DVD. Also it won't play properly on all TVs in Europe, but almost all. 2) Make a PAL DVD either from 23.976 by doing it yourself or by requesting 25p or 50i. I personally wouldn't blindly rely on someone doing a proper frame rate conversion for you. My experience is, most people don't know what they are doing (sometimes even the professionals) and think their NLE does it magically right. Last edited by TheSkiller; 17th November 2012 at 13:06. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
OK, the best way I know to convert the 23.98 --> 25, is to use Cinematools for converting the Video and Audio streams and then take the audio and correct the pitch with ProTools, right? Is there a better way? Thanks! PS: If we take the 25p, it will come directly from a MAJOR studio from US. I think I will trust them to do the conversion!
__________________
" 2 minds are better than 1 " Last edited by srfscenar; 17th November 2012 at 19:51. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 632
|
Quote:
I don't know Cinematools, but to be honest since 23.976 -> 25 via Speed-up is a two-liner Avisynth script (excluding audio), I'd just do it using AviSynth. There's one huge advantage: you can be sure it does exactly what you tell it to. Also, while you're at it, that's where you could do the scaling to DVD frame size. There are some quirks and tricks concerning the scaling. Scaling from HD to SD is surprisingly a rather complex process actually. Well, it all depends on how much effort you want to put into it, since there are no "best" settings but consider the following to be most likely quite a bit superior compared to what most NLEs would spit out. Code:
SourceFilter("1080p23.976 Source") #depends on source AssumeFPS(25) #Speed-Up to 25 fps #scaling, here is a suggestion specifically for HD to SD Sharpen(0.5, 0) #pre-sharpen horizontally to better keep hor. details BlackmanResize(704, 576, taps=4) Blur(0, 0.6).Sharpen(0, 0.4) #mild vertical low-pass 704x576 is a valid DVD frame size by the way, without going into further detail, it's a good thing to use. The only thing that is a bit troubling in the Speed-Up process is the audio. Video stays unchanged, the frames are just played back faster. A pitch-corrected conversion style would be desireable. Basically, you need to strip the original audio from the video file and use some audio editor to apply Speed-Up. Almost every audio editor has a preset for that. After that the audio needs to be encoded to a DVD compatible audio format (MP2, AC3 or WAV, at 48 kHz) and can then be used together with the CCE encoded MPEG2 video to author a DVD. Quote:
But let me just mention this: quite many times I have seen videos here on PAL TV, say major music videos for example, which originated from 23.976 fps, converted in a truly awful way where one frame each second was simply shown twice (result: ugly stutter every second). Everything is possible nowadays... Last edited by TheSkiller; 17th November 2012 at 21:26. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 601
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|