Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
21st May 2019, 18:50 | #1661 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 201
|
Faster decoding in Firefox thanks to Dav1d:
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2019/0...ter-than-ever/ Quote:
|
|
25th May 2019, 17:52 | #1665 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
You had to enable the setting on testtube back then, though. |
|
28th May 2019, 09:16 | #1667 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
What is currently the fastest AV1 encoder?
__________________
https://github.com/stax76/software-list https://www.youtube.com/@stax76/playlists |
28th May 2019, 12:50 | #1669 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
I'll be waiting for improved encoders then.
__________________
https://github.com/stax76/software-list https://www.youtube.com/@stax76/playlists |
28th May 2019, 13:26 | #1670 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,795
|
rav1e is "fast" with ok quality.
__________________
AVSRepoGUI // VSRepoGUI - Package Manager for AviSynth // VapourSynth VapourSynth Portable FATPACK || VapourSynth Database |
28th May 2019, 13:36 | #1671 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
Last time I tried rav1e 2019-04-30 and it was SLOW AS HELL, like < 1 fps.
__________________
https://github.com/stax76/software-list https://www.youtube.com/@stax76/playlists |
28th May 2019, 13:38 | #1672 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,795
|
1 fps is fast for av1
__________________
AVSRepoGUI // VSRepoGUI - Package Manager for AviSynth // VapourSynth VapourSynth Portable FATPACK || VapourSynth Database |
29th May 2019, 06:56 | #1674 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Berlin
Posts: 173
|
Again thank you very much for staxrip!!!
i use in staxrip a custom cmd line for ffmpeg aomenc from streaming media experts. -c:v libaom-av1 -crf 40 -b:v 0 -strict experimental -threads 24 -tiles 8x2 -cpu-used 5 -row-mt 1 https://www.streamingmedia.com/Artic...ls-130284.aspx https://www.reddit.com/r/AV1/comment...s_mostly_with/ also new version of rav1e with tiles support brings up to 3 fps for fullhd content https://blog.rom1v.com/2019/04/imple...ding-in-rav1e/ |
29th May 2019, 13:35 | #1675 | Link |
Artem S. Tashkinov
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 345
|
At this time shouldn't we consider AV1 a failure and move on to newer codecs, e.g AV2?
|
29th May 2019, 15:19 | #1676 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,348
|
You do realize that a newer codec would end up even more complex, and thus even slower, and also slowing down hardware adoption even more?
All your points can be applied for any new codec. - Mobile hardware, especially on the low-end, is inherently slow. The dav1d AV1 decoder can decode 1080p on mid-range and high-end mobile devices. But for mainstream roll out, thats not going to be used anyway, because it uses too much battery. - Encoder development takes years. You must not have been around when any other codec was new. On top of that, any new codec is also always going to be slower then previous codecs. You pay for quality or compression with speed. - Hardware development also takes years. Noone knolwedgeable ever realistically expected AV1 to show up in hardware before the end of 2020 or so. The turn-around times for hardware are really long. Hardware you see launch/announced today was long through the design process before AV1 was finished. Any other new codec would be in the exact same situation a year or so after the spec was officially finalized. In fact this is already looking pretty good on adoption, most major browsers now include AV1 decoders, and YouTube is rolling out content. Basically, do some more research on how codec lifetime has been in the past for any other codec.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders Last edited by nevcairiel; 29th May 2019 at 15:24. |
29th May 2019, 16:50 | #1677 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Swansea, Wales, UK
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
|
|
29th May 2019, 16:54 | #1678 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Swansea, Wales, UK
Posts: 196
|
To add to Nevcariel's reply to Birdie, I would not expect any ASIC decoders to appear on AMD CPU's as they are generally integrated into the GPU design, which also means they end up in APU's aswell - once they have an ASIC it will be on the nearest APU or GPU release from that point.
|
30th May 2019, 11:10 | #1680 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,348
|
Quote:
In such a scenario, even the slowest encoder is acceptable if it saves enough bytes. In that scenario, VP9 also didn't fail. It gets used for a lot of content on the web.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
|
|
|